CHAPTER THIRTEEN
On April 28-May 1, 1985, the Banbury Conference on Genetically-Altered Viruses and Environment was
held at Banbury Center Laboratories. Banbury Center is the former Eugenics Records Office in Cold
Spring Harbor, Long Island. The old Harriman laboratories, which began in 1904 with eugenics
experiments designed to create a "perfect" white race and worked for the destruction of blacks and poor
whites during the pellagra scourge and opened its facilities to German Nazi scientists during the Thirties,
hosted this event.17
The world's foremost molecular biologists and virologists assembled for a conference on: the
epidemiology of viruses altered by man. While ostensibly held under the auspices of the Cold Spring
Harbor facility, the gathering was carefully supervised and monitored by the U.S. government. At the
instruction of several U.S. intelligence agencies, the proceedings deemed sensitive were held under
conditions of strict secrecy.
The official sponsors of the conference were almost all multinational corporations—or their private
foundations—with close links to the Olympians. The roster was as follows:
IBM.
The Grace Foundation Inc.
Texaco Philanthropic Foundation Inc.
The Chevron Fund.
The Dow Chemical Company.
Exxon Corporation.
Phillips Petroleum Foundation Inc.
The Bristol Myers Fund Inc.
Rockwell International Corporation Trust.
The Procter and Gamble Company.
These organizations all donated large sums of money for future research. The U.S. government also
contributed a substantial amount of money, although the exact amount could not be determined. Letters of
inquiry about this use of taxpayer funds, ddressed to the General Accounting Office, went unanswered.
Other corporate sponsors who donated various sums of money were mainly drawn from the Olympian
network, and for this reason, they are significant:
E. L. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
Hoffman-La Roche.
Monsanto Company.
Agrigenics Corporation.
Beckton Dickinson and Company.
Ciba-Geigy Corporation.
Genetics Institute.
Johnson and Johnson.
Schering Plough Corporation.
UpJohn Company.
Genentech Inc.
American International.
Biogen S.A.
Eli Lilly and Co.
Pall Corporation.
American Cyanamid Company.
Cetus Corporation.
Pfizer Inc.
CPC International Inc.
Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals Inc.
Smith Kline and French Laboratories.
Nearly all of the above are top companies in the pharmaceutical industry or leaders in genetic research.
All are connected in one way or another with David Rockefeller, the Harrimans and the Morgan Banks.
In the spring of 1985, the American public was not yet concerned about AIDS. The President of the
United States had never spoken the word publicly. It was still regarded as a curse upon drug addicts and
homosexuals. Most Americans believed that their odds of infection were about the same as hitting the
lottery. Rock Hudson was still alive. It was his death that October that shocked the national media—and
the public—into asking serious questions about this thing called AIDS. The notion that it was created by
human hand was nothing more than sick fantasy.
Fact or fantasy? You decide after reading E. D. Kilbourne's paper "Epidemiology of Viruses Altered By
Man" presented to the Conference. Kilbourne went into great detail about what he called a "maximally
malignant monster virus," (MMMV) which he stated could be created in spite of the difficulties that
would be encountered in synthesizing it.
His paper was, in effect, a mere confirmation, although he posed it hypothetically:
"Because we know the primary structure of many viral genes and have the technical capacity to
synthesize both genes and gene products, it would appear that planned design of friendly or unfriendly
viruses is not too remote a possibility. If the latter should be the perverse goal of our paranoid society, can
we construct a virus worse than rabies virus with its 100 percent fatality rate or influenza with its
pandemic potential for twenty million deaths worldwide? Hypothetically: yes. "But if the creation of MMMV is unlikely to the point of absurdity, we must also appreciate that in the
proper setting single base changes may be sufficient to significantly influence viral properties, including
virulence.
Then in an amazing revelation, Kilbourne seemed to come close to admitting that AIDS was indeed a
created retrovirus, although he did not actually name it: "The more imaginative vistas of genetic
engineering are concerned less with the modification of existing viruses than with the segregation and
manipulation of single virus genes. Perforce, the epidemiology of virus genes in new nvironmental or
even different temporal context must be considered."
In other words, the creation of new retroviruses was what appealed to the most advanced microbiologists.
Kilbourne then issued a warning that the freezers of most laboratories "are potential if unlikely sources of
new pathogens…Manipulation of the genes of viruses capable of genetic reassortment must not be
undertaken without awareness that these viruses comprise an extended genotype or gene reservoir
available for interspecific viral gene transmission."
Research of this nature was precisely what was done at Fort Detrick and Los Alamos and Cold Spring
Harbor. One of the most telling admissions during the Conference came when it was disclosd that the
purpose of genetic tinkering with the envelope of the HIV virus was to broaden the range of target cells
for infection.
Dr. Robert Gallo, the head of AIDS research for the National Institutes of Health, attended the Banbury
Conference and felt safe enough to admit, in a moment of spontaneity, that deliberate genetic tampering
with viruses had created new, unnatural lethal viruses. In the discussions that followed the presentation of
a paper, "Genomic Variations of HTLV-III/LAV, the Retrovirus of AIDS," co-authored by Beatrice H.
Hahn, George Shaw, Flossie Wong Staal and Gallo himself, one of the delegates, H. Fields, asked the
following question:
"If you took the HTLV LTR's or the region involving transcription and put it into other retroviruses or
other viruses, would you have any concern about it in terms of the hosts or the environment?"
As if unthinkingly, Gallo blurted out: "It is already being done."
In plain language, what Fields was asking was: "If we made dangerous new viruses, would you be
worried about it?"
Fields followed up by asking: "What would be the nature of your concern, considering everything you
have done?"
As a scientist regarded (wrongly) as a world-class microbiologist, Gallo was supposed to be doing
everything in his power to stop the march of AIDS. He answered: "I am not overly concerned about
attaching the HTLV-III LTR to the genome of other retroviruses because there is much evidence that the
cytopathic genome of HTLV III does involve the need for specific regions of the HTLV genome. I would
be concerned about doing things that broaden the range of target cells for infection or if something we've
done to alter the envelope gives it greater capacity for survival. I would be concerned."
If something we've done to alter the envelope gives it greater capacity for survival. I would be concerned.
He went on to say: Incidentally even HTLV-I is spreading in many parts of the world because it has a
very long latency period and only a 1:100 isease-to-virus infection ratio. It is much less evident, but I
suspect HTLV-I is going to be an increasing problem 10-30 years from now. In summary, I would
evaluate each planned alteration carefully."
I would evaluate each planned alteration carefully. Gallo's own words can lead only to the conclusion that
the alteration of the structure of viruses was ongoing in 1985, and already far advanced. At a closed
session of the proceedings, discussions were held about the research of a group of British doctors who
wrote a paper stating that they had found the answer to why certain people appear to get AIDS more
readily than others. It was in the genes.
Doctors Lesley Jane Eales, Keith Nye and Anthony Pinching found the method of isolating the right gene
that resists AIDS and the gene that does not. This should have been an important landmark in AIDS
research, qualifying the doctors for the Nobel Prize. But instead of world-wide recognition for their
astounding achievement, Dr. Pinching, leader of the team, was forced to withdraw the group's findings on
the specious grounds that "an error was subsequently discovered and some of the data was flawed."
The three British pioneers had to be forced underground. Their findings would have caused political
explosions around the world. Even the layman would have understood why Africa and Brazil and Haiti
were being ravaged by AIDS, while the disease was not spreading as rapidly in Western Europe and the
United States: the British scientists had discovered that the AIDS virus attacked the GC-1 gene, common
to blacks and "coloreds," more redily than the GC-2 gene common to whites. This would explain why
blacks and Hispanics in the U.S. are contracting the disease at a much faster rate than whites: They're
genetically more susceptible to HIV.18
The report of proceedings at Cold Spring Harbor betrayed their true arrogance. Their conclusion was that
the world would never believe that the AIDS virus was the result of genetic reprogramming. There was
nothing to worry about. The public should just continue to be told that the creation of such a dangerous
retrovirus belonged in the realm of the absurd. Any attempt to open up the truth about genetic
tampering—which led to the birth of the AIDS virus and others yet to emerge—would simply be denied
and explained away. (Which is exactly what has happened ever since.)
A year after the Banbury Conference, in 1986, there was, as one intelligence report described it, "a further
gathering of the initiated at Cold spring Harbor." They were there to hear Professor W. Bodmer of the
Imperial Cancer Research Institute, a world-renowned Oxford geneticist, speak on "The Molecular
Biology of Homo Sapiens."
Here is a quote from the intelligence report: "Behind closed doors several delegates expressed the view
that population explosion was the greatest threat to the stability of the world, echoing the words of Sir
Julian Huxley19 Harbor Conference: "population growth is the most alarming problem and loss of genetic
quality must be reversed."
"Professor Bodmer began his address by saying: 'Analyses of normal human variability in facial features,
character and mental abilities is surely one of the real challenges of human genetics. Now, with the
availability of polymorphic DNA markers, there is a well-defined approach. The DNA technology that is
now available should in due course be able to answer the question as to whether indeed the genes that
control facial features and certain aspects of behavior are closely linked…Knowledge of the total human
genome sequence has profound implications, not only for the analysis, prevention, and treatment of
disease, but also for the better understanding of normal variations, and through that, hopefully, making a
contribution to solving broader problems of society.' "Behind closed doors, Bodmer left his listeners in no doubt that one of the greatest 'broader problems of
society' was overpopulation of the world by 'undesirables,' and population explosions among black
nations urgently needed to be arrested and stopped altogether, and their populations drastically reduced.
Although the word AIDS was not mentioned, the sum and substance of Bodmer's remarks left his
audience in no doubt that genetically-engineered retroviruses were the only hope of achieving the desired
goal."
But the top scientists in the most powerful institutions were hard at work on those genetically-engineered
retroviruses.
Chapters 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Appendices - Footnotes
All of the events and characters depicted in this book
are non-fictional
Copyright © 1994 by Dr. Gary L. Glum
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American
Copyright conventions. Published in the United States by
Silent Walker Publishing, Los Angeles.
ISBN 0-9620364-1-2
Manufactured in the United States of America
Typography and binding design by Silent Walker Publishing
First Edition |
|
SILENT WALKER
PUBLISHING
LOS ANGELES |
Disclaimer:
The information on this website is presented for educational purposes
only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment and
advice of a qualified licensed professional.
Throughout this
website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or functions
of nutritional products. These statements have not been evaluated by the
Food and Drug Administration and these materials and products are not
intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
Yadda-yadda
The world gets crazier and crazier everyday, doesn't it? The world that many
of us thought was there, isn't. The bottom has dropped out of everything. The
illusions have been revealed, we have found out who has been pulling the strings
behind the scenes. Millions have lost their jobs, have mortgage
problems, and
foreclosure. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been
taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild
dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government
of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit
me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its
laws." Get
the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system.
It's all about 'commerce'. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for
each individual. Not only does this end
personal debt, it places the people first in line
as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for
you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Is
your credit rating bad for reasons that seem out of your control? There are
ways of credit repair,
so you can men those broken fences too. Do you want to keep your children protected
from outside forces, there are ways of protecting
your children. Do you want
to keep your sons and daughters free from 'the draft'? Check this out.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses,
and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site
range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can
grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric.
These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present
multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. If
you have more information on a certain subject that verifies it, challenges
it or make a comment on it, please e.mail
us.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
 |
|
