CHAPTER NINE
The destruction of the homosexual community has created one of the most dangerous myths we face
about AIDS: that it is primarily transmitted by sexual contact. AIDS is not an "ordinary" venereal disease;
a sort of deadly gonorrhea. AIDS is a blood-borne virus. As Dr. Daniel Benson of UCLA says, "blood is
the major avenue of contamination."
That simple fact invalidates everything we've been taught to believe about the spread of AIDS. As Dr.
John Seale explains: "Scientists and doctors have repeatedly stated as fact that the AIDS virus is
fundamentally transmitted during sexual intercourse, but is, unfortunately, sometimes transmitted in
blood. This is highly misleading, though published laboratory and epidemiological evidence, and
editorials in scientific and medical journals, have been heavily slanted to support this "fact."
"In reality, AIDS is a characteristically blood transmitted infection, which is only transmitted with
difficulty during sexual intercourse compared with the genuine sexually transmitted diseases gonorrhea
and trichomonosias. All the exceptional epidemiological evidence is consistent with this view. Obviously
AIDS is transmittable during sexual intercourse, but so is influenza, glandular fever and scabies. Sexual
intercourse is only one of many ways by which the virus can be transmitted, and is by no means the most
efficient…
"Having assumed for a variety of motives that AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease like syphilus or
gonorrhea, a negligible research effort has gone into the critical matter of transmission.… As far as it
goes, the tiny research effort into infectivity of bodily fluids indicates that saliva is far more infectious
than genital secretions, but that blood and serum is vastly more infectious than either. Consequently the
idea that condoms can have any significant effect on the spread of AIDS in a nation is utterly
preposterous. Governments all over the world are spending millions of pounds advising their citizens to
prevent AIDS by using condoms on the basis of manifestly fraudulent misrepresentation of scientific
evidence presented by scientists themselves."
No lifestyle is safe enough to guarantee protection from infection. The terrible truth is that the risk for
most people—who feel safe from the AIDS plague, because they are heterosexual, monogamous, drugfree—
is far greater than is generally known. Dr. Seale: "People with AIDS are categorized as belonging
to a small number of 'risk groups,' giving the false impression that the vast majority of people cannot get
AIDS. AIDS is portrayed as only a behavioral disease caused by sexual and narcotic misdemeanors. This
implies that if anybody gets AIDS, it is their own fault. Emphasis on transmission of the virus during
sexual intercourse and education as a solution to the epidemic implies that the disease will disappear with
modified behavior. This misses the point that as the epidemic explodes, infection by chance, non-sexual,
contact becomes even more common."
How many Americans believe that even kissing can spread the virus? Here is what Dr. Marcello Piazza, a
world renowned authority on AIDS, published in the Journal of The American Medical Society on
January 13, 1989: "It is generally accepted that the presence of blood in saliva is indirect evidence that
microlesions are present in the oral cavity. During kissing, two mucosae, both of which may contain
microlesions come into close contact. The intense rubbing that occurs during kissing can favor both the
creation of microlesions and the passage of blood from one partner to the other. If the blood of one partner
contains HIV, the virus can pass into the bloodstream of the other partner.
"Our study has shown that microlesions are normally present in the oral mucosae and that saliva contains
blood. Therefore, we feel that passionate kissing cannot be considered 'protective sex' for the transmission
of human immunodeficiency virus infection. We found that blood is present in the saliva of fifty percent
of subjects examined, its level increasing significantly after brushing of teeth or passionate kissing."
Two teenagers necking are at risk.
In a meeting in Montreal in 1989, several virologists and doctors confirmed that kissing will transmit
AIDS. But government doctors and scientists who wanted to attend were told they would face
"disciplinary action." So the meeting was boycotted by many who most needed to be present. But if
kissing can pass the infection, how much value do condoms really have? Not much, if any. "Safe sex" is a myth, knowingly created by our leaders to avoid public panic—or wrath. "Safe sex" is
advertised as a panacea for AIDS. Big name stars are used to promote this deadly fraud. But condoms are
not a solution for AIDS; they merely spread permissiveness—and put even more people in jeopardy,
believing they are "safe" if they use them.
Dr. William O'connor, a noted AIDS researcher, has stated flatly: "Nearly every fluid in the human body
is capable of transmitting the virus, including blood, saliva, tears and sweat. People have become infected
by simply touching the blood of virus carriers or having microscopic quantities of infected blood strike
their faces. Viruses have been cultured from the air of operating rooms. All that is required (to become
infected) is that a single virus particle has to come in contact with a susceptible human cell."
One drop of infected blood is all it takes. Even now, in 1994, our blood supply is significantly more
dangerous than Americans realize. The average American is under the impression that AIDScontaminated
blood was a problem a few years ago, but that it has been corrected and the supply is now
completely safe. It is potentially a fatal mistake to believe that. Transfusion, in fact, still carries more risk
of AIDS infection than the authorities want you to know.
Already, tens of thousands of Americans have contracted AIDS through blood transfusions—and that
number grows daily. Take the terrible plight of American hemophiliacs. As long ago as March 1990, the
Journal of the American Medical Association admitted that as many as sixty to eighty percent of
America's hemophiliacs had been infected with AIDS through contaminated blood transfusions.
In spite of attempts by hospitals to limit their liability for administering transfusions of HIV-tainted blood,
the next few years will see a flood of lawsuits by unknowing recipients. All Kaiser hospitals in San
Francisco have been warned of this, and Kaiser admitted privately a few years ago that it believed they
had already transfused an estimated 30,000 patients with HIV-tainted blood. But the American Red Cross
continues to sell HIV-tainted blood to blood banks across the country.
Why the Red Cross? Doesn't the Red Cross do marvelous humanitarian work? Yes, it does, but in its
management of blood banks, it has been criminally negligent. By allowing its computer management
control of blood supplies to break down, the Red Cross was unable to properly monitor blood collected
from donors. Passwords for computer entry were stolen and used to falsify computer records to cover up
that blood allegedly tested had not been tested. The result was that thousands of people received HIVcontaminated
blood. This showed up very quickly in hemophiliacs; over 2000 of them became infected by
Red Cross blood. The Red Cross was forced to appoint an internal panel to sort out the mess it had made.
The Red Cross still hasn't instituted a uniform system of screening dangerous would-be donors, such as
persons suffering from AIDS, Hepatitis or TB—even drug users who inject their poison. Dr. Robert
Mendleson, a noted author, stated on a radio talk show that eighty percent of doctors surveyed would not
accept Red Cross blood for use on themselves or their families.
Even as mainstream a magazine as Money, as recently as its May 1994 issue, carried a major expose, "America's Dangerous Blood Supply," detailing how AIDS carriers are still being allowed to donate
blood. "After 10 years of testing donor blood for HIV," Money wrote in its ads for that issue, "Americans
are still contracting the disease through transfusions. Remarkable as that may sound, what's even more
startling is that these tragedies occur due to human error, flawed testing and legal loopholes. Not to
mention the fact that the FDA, heavily influenced by the American Red Cross and other blood bank
leaders, resisted adopting a more accurate blood test because it cost an additional $3. Why do concerns for
cost outweigh those for human life?"
The answer is this: Blood is big business. American Red Cross blood revenues are approaching $100
million a year—much of it clear profit. The International Red Cross is a major trader in blood, receiving
more than $4 billion a year in revenues around the world.
The problem may be even worse overseas. Poor countries without adequate facilities of their own are
large markets for imported blood. One intelligence report monitoring infected blood supplied to targeted
countries (India in this case) indicated that one million Indians have AIDS—twice as many as reported by
the World Health Organization. Contaminated blood supplied to India contained HIV-1, HIV-II and
HTLV-1 and HTLV-II.
Hospitals are the most vulnerable to a blood-borne virus. The one institution designed as a safe place to
cure us of our ills is now on the front lines of spreading the infection. The number of hospital care
workers with reported cases of AIDS rose from 1.7 percent in 1983 to 5.7 percent in 1987. And while
assuring hospital care workers that they were not in a high risk category, the Centers for Disease Control
recommended that they handle all patients as if they were infected with AIDS.
Have you visited a hospital recently and noticed the small, inconspicuous signs in bathrooms and
hallways—under the headline "Universal Precautions"—reminding the staff to regard every patient as a
potential carrier of blood-borne pathogens? They're sort of like the notices in Camus' The Plague: "One
had the feeling that many concessions had been made to a desire not to alarm the public."
The small notices are a subtle way of reminding doctors and nurses and staff that everyone they encounter
is a deadly threat. Even the tiniest mistake—say, an accidental prick of their skin from a used
syringe—can now cost them their lives. Doctors and health care workers are instructed to wear masks,
gloves and gowns—and not to give mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, using resuscitation bags instead. All
wards must have such bags on hand. "There is a growing sense of anxiety among American surgeons concerning the AIDS epidemic," says one
intelligence agent, "and the high risk that all operating room personnel now face because of the heavy
incidence of AIDS." AIDS is being spread in operating rooms through the use of high-speed power tools
used as surgical instruments. Tests have now determined that the AIDS virus can live on dry surfaces
outside the body for seven days and wet surfaces for fourteen days.
The Pasteur Institute has confirmed findings of live AIDS viruses on wet and dry surfaces outside the
body, a stunning piece of news that the media managed to ignore. Stated the report: "Infectious virus was
still detected after fifteen days at room temperature. Infectious virus could be recovered from dried
material after up to three days at room temperature and in an aqueous environment survived longer than
fifteen days."
Stanford University conducted tests for the U.S. Biological Warfare Department of the Department of
Defense which showed that AIDS-contaminated blood deposited onto a surgeon's rotating drill
contaminated the air with a fine aerosol mist, containing live HIV particles of microscopic size which
were deposited in a fine layer—like cigarette smoke—on walls, operating tables and other surfaces. When
human skin was exposed to the mist, it was susceptible to HIV infection.
Anyone not wearing a mask who entered the room between surgeries could inhale as much as five
micrograms of these aerosolized blood particles—and run a higher than normal risk of contracting AIDS.
Unless all surfaces are perfectly swabbed down, even an empty operating room is a dangerous place.
What if, in the normal high-speed rush, proper cleansing procedures are not carried out between patients?
The study suggests that an infected glove carelessly left on a surface for a few minutes before disposal
could deposit the HIV virus on that surface and place at risk anyone who touched it bare handed in the
next few days.
But emergency rooms are the most dangerous of all. Says one intelligent agent: "At hospitals like John
Hopkins University Hospital, almost fourteen percent of those who come to the emergency room with
penetrating wounds test positive for AIDS. The bloodiest wounded pose the most serious threat." A recent
study showed that forty percent of all males admitted to emergency rooms in the Miami area were HIV
positive.
Even a visit to the doctor's or dentist's office carries a hazard. The Centers for Disease Control does not
like to report how many licensed medical personnel are AIDS carriers. But according to the Medical
World News, as of 1992 there were more than 5,000 dentists, doctors and health care workers infected
with the virus. One intelligence agent who monitors the situation places the number at closer to 8,000.
In a study published in the British medical journal The Lancet by a team of microbiologists from the
University of Georgia led by Dr. David Lewis, the possible transmission of the HIV virus through dental
equipment was opened up for scrutiny. The scientists used DNA techniques to identify evidence of the
human immunodeficiency virus in two types of commonly used dental tools: the drill and the prophylaxis
angle, which dentists use to clean and polish teeth.
The research team tested twelve high-speed drills and forty prophylaxis, and in all cases, they found
material containing the HIV virus trapped in the equipment. Dr. Lewis and his team found that HIV
escapes the typical chemical disinfectant. "It is usually applied on the outside, which is not enough" said
the Lancet report. The substances "were blown out" when the tools were reused, even though they were
disinfected with chemical germicides, which suggested a risk of depositing the HIV material in the next
patient's mouth. (Similar tests with Hepatitis B were conducted with the same results.) "It truly poses a
risk just like a contaminated needle does to a healthcare worker," said Dr. Lewis.
The case of Kimberly Bergalis, a beautiful, 23-year-old who contracted AIDS after a visit to an infected
dentist was well publicized by the national news media. Her father, George Bergalis, called Dr. Acer (who
died on September 3, 1990) a murderer. "Someone who has AIDS and continues to practice is nothing
better than a murderer, that is all they are," he told reporters. "They might as well take a gun and shoot
somebody in the head with it."
Kimberly called medical doctors and Acer's colleagues "wimps and bastards," because even when Acer
was in the last and most virulent stages of the HIV infection, they allowed him to work, never reporting
his condition to the health authorities. Acer was indeed a bastard. He only discussed his condition with the
Centers for Disease Control on one occasion, and then, only for an hour. He also destroyed his records.
Those who knew him believe he may have been suffering from AIDS-related dementia and intentionally
infected Kimberley Bergalis—and perhaps others.
Chapters 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - Appendices - Footnotes
All of the events and characters depicted in this book
are non-fictional
Copyright © 1994 by Dr. Gary L. Glum
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American
Copyright conventions. Published in the United States by
Silent Walker Publishing, Los Angeles.
ISBN 0-9620364-1-2
Manufactured in the United States of America
Typography and binding design by Silent Walker Publishing
First Edition |
|
SILENT WALKER
PUBLISHING
LOS ANGELES |
Disclaimer:
The information on this website is presented for educational purposes
only. It is not intended as a substitute for the diagnosis, treatment and
advice of a qualified licensed professional.
Throughout this
website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or functions
of nutritional products. These statements have not been evaluated by the
Food and Drug Administration and these materials and products are not
intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
Yadda-yadda
The world gets crazier and crazier everyday, doesn't it? The world that many
of us thought was there, isn't. The bottom has dropped out of everything. The
illusions have been revealed, we have found out who has been pulling the strings
behind the scenes. Millions have lost their jobs, have mortgage
problems, and
foreclosure. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been
taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild
dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government
of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit
me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its
laws." Get
the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system.
It's all about 'commerce'. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for
each individual. Not only does this end
personal debt, it places the people first in line
as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for
you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Is
your credit rating bad for reasons that seem out of your control? There are
ways of credit repair,
so you can men those broken fences too. Do you want to keep your children protected
from outside forces, there are ways of protecting
your children. Do you want
to keep your sons and daughters free from 'the draft'? Check this out.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses,
and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site
range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can
grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric.
These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present
multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. If
you have more information on a certain subject that verifies it, challenges
it or make a comment on it, please e.mail
us.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
 |
|
