"The evidence showing that the World Trade Center towers
were demolished is compelling. Here are a few photos of explosives
detonating during the collapse of the South Tower. Each frame is numbered
by its position in the video. The video was shot at 30 frames per second.
So an eight frame interval covers about one quarter of a second.
Frame 147 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face
at the 79th floor.
Frame 203 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face
at the 75th floor.
The right photos show the dust from the explosions outlined in red.
The third row of the photos shows the relative positions of the two lines
of dust.
It has been claimed that the explosions of dust that span the east face
of the tower, were caused by air being forced from the windows as each of
the floors above collapsed. This explanation is obviously incorrect. If it
was correct, such lines of dust would have been expelled from the windows
of each floor in succession. That is, we would have seen such lines of
dust expelled from floors 79, 78, 77, 76 and 75 in succession, but what we
observe is an explosion of dust at floor 79, no new clouds of dust for a
few floors, then another explosion of dust at floor 75.
On the left is a photo of a 1975 Controlled
Demolition of 361 foot Mendes Caldeira Building in São Paulo, Brazil
Note the demolition squibs at intervals along the face of the building.
These were simultaneous explosions. Possibly sequential explosions were
necessary at the WTC to simulate a collapse.
It is worth noting that the second line of (much larger) explosions occur
at the center of a section of mechanical floors (the three mechanical
floors appear as a slightly darker gray band across the building and are
important for the strength they impart to the building). It is possible
that the mechanical floors 76 and 75 (and also 74) have no windows, but of
course, if this is so, it raises many more questions than it answers. In
particular, if the mechanical floors have no windows, then the explosions
of dust from floor 75 cannot be caused by air being forced from them as
the floors above collapsed. There should have been dust from the windows
on floors 78, 77, 76, 74, 73 etc.
Since
Martin Bush,
brother of "President" George W. Bush, sat on the board of directors of
the company that has the security contract for the World Trade Center, it
would be feasible to gain covert access to the mechanical floors of the
WTC to plant demolition charges. Even the 79th floor could be
reached via the elevator shafts at the core of the building. Since
the World Trade Center is a series of floors suspended from the core and
stabilized by the external columns, it should only be necessary to rig the
demolition charges where the floor supports connect to the core columns.
The dust due to the visible explosions is a whitish grey. The dust from
the demolition of the upper section (which is disintegrating as it falls)
is dark grey. One wonders what caused this difference."
[Testifying
before a congressional inquiry] Gene Corley of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, said the Port Authority [of New York and New Jersey]
refused to hand over blueprints for the twin towers - crucial for
evaluating the wreckage - until he signed a waiver saying his team would
not use the plans in a lawsuit against the agency [that is, against FEMA].
- New York Daily News, 2002-03-07
Danish author, investigator, and
scientist, Henrik Melvang has studied many video clips of the World Trade
Center demolition, putting over 1,000 hours into his investigation.
His video investigation can be obtained from
http://www.bombsinsidewtc.dk/
He reports:
You may say
that you have seen some TV Transmissions, which did not edit the "Tower
Scene" in this manner. This is true, and in my video I will show some of
these few TV Transmissions, which actually did give us a chance to follow
the entire WTC facade, as it collapsed from the TOP to the Bottom. But in
general most TV stations did not show the ENTIRE WTC Tower facade during
the ENTIRE duration of the Tower Collapse. As I said before I have seen
many different TV stations video versions of the "Tower collapse," but in
general 99% of the TOTAL AIRING of the Tower scenes did not give any
evidence of the numerous of "clouds" from EXPLODING Bombs "popping out of
the windows" of the WTC facade far below the crash level of the collapsing
tower.
This high number of
99% of the total airplay does make an important difference for the average
viewer who had no knowledge of a conspiracy. The effect of TV is basically
"exposure". But in reality the Tower Scene should have been edited in a
much different manner - if we look at the "Photographic nature of the
Tower scene".
Usually when the
TV News media shows a controlled demolition of a building anywhere in the
world, they NEVER forget to give the TV audience the "Full Picture" of the
scene. They always give us a "Long Distance shot of the entire Tower
scene". They may show us some "Zoomed in details" also , but they will
never miss the opportunity to show you the "full picture" of the entire
fall of the tower (or building). Every year the TV News media show us such
demolition scenes of various buildings. I have never seen a TV
Transmission which did not give the "Full Picture" - have you ?.
The "Photographic Nature of the Scene" would call for a "wide angle view"
- so that the TV audience can see the tower falling in it's full length.
But the Tower event of "September 11" turned out to be different !
And this was not because the long distance cameras were not in place to
shoot the "Horizontal Long Distance Tower Scenes." Never in recorded world
history had so many long distance cameras focused on the very same subject
as between 9:00 AM and 10:30(?) on Sept. 11, 2001. Why then is the obvious
long distance shoot of the WTC collapse so badly represented in the TV
Transmissions ?
It totally
contradicts the nature of the Tower Scene - does it not?!
The answer to this question is obvious: Someone in the "editing rooms" did
not want to give us the "Full Picture"!
He has also found that the video
soundtracks had been similarly manipulated to cover the sounds of the
World Trade Center being demolished by explosives:
a) In my video I will give evidence that the ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK had been
changed and that which was shown on TV had been manipulated in many
critical scenes related to the WTC Towers Collapse. I´m convinced that
this SOUND TRACK manipulation was made in order to cover up the TRUE SOUND
of the "EXPLODING BOMBS" inside WTC.
a) The Video clips were often edited in a manner which did not include the
SECONDS PRIOR to the Tower Collapse. Sound travels at a speed of circa 300
meters in a second. Had the original sound been played and shown on TV ,
then the TV viewers would have been able to calculate the distance and
speed, and then afterwards concluded that it must have been EXPLODING
BOMBS that were giving the loud noise, because the BOMB SOUND could be
heard BEFORE the Tower collapse had visually begun.
b) Also I will show evidence that "Distorted Noise" from the "street" and
loud noises from "Car Horns and Police Sirens" were later ADDED to the
sound track of the "Tower Scenes" - so that no TV viewer could hear the
loud noise from the bombs exploding inside the Buildings.
c)I will present several perfect videoclips from both "American TV", "Danish
TV" and the "German TV" - which gives evidence that "distorted Sound
PARTS," that did NOT belong to the "Tower Collapse-scenes," were in fact
PLAYED along with these videoclips in order to CORRUPT the original sound
of the factual "Tower event".
I can be totally sure of all this since I have detected very specific
"Horn and Siren" Police car SOUND - and discovered that this particular
"SOUND Bite" was PLAYED along with BOTH the Collapse of the "North Tower"
but also several hours later when the "7 WTC Building" fell down (later on
the afternoon). In reality such a "repetition" of one particular sound
bite - several hours later - would be statistical impossible!
German engineers help the USA - what your government
is not telling you - interesting WTC analysis.
Here are some of the anomalies and facts that
Karl Moor has gathered:
- More energy was required for the WTC demolition
than was available from gravity alone.
- A symmetrical explosion all around the building
occurred before the building began to fall
- The upper portion of the building was pulverized
from the bottom up
- Only after the upper portion was pulverized to
dust did the lower part pulverize from above down to the street, without
effect of gravity
- Layer of dust several centimeters thick never
occurred with another demolition
- The finer the pieces, the more energy is needed to
pulverize
- Demolition to transportable chunks would take
about 1 kg explosive for 100 tons steel and concrete
- Gravity will provide 50% of energy
- To pulverize concrete takes 10 X
more energy
- WTC 1, 2, 3, and 7 was 1.4 million tons which
would require 14 tons of conventional explosive
- Fire burned under the rubble for over 3 months,
extinguished 12.19.01
- At exactly the same moment WTC 2 explodes, top is
blown out of adjoining WTC 6
- As WTC 2 begins to fall, the lower part of the falling portion is
demolished instead of the upper portion of the stable structure below
- Pulverization of upper part of falling WTC 2
provides no pressure from above
- New explosions can be seen below the pulverized
part of WTC 2
- Only pressure of falling building would have left
steel core standing
- Other progressive detonations could not be seen because of the
cape of cascading debris
- WTC 1 top pulverizes before demolition of lower
part of building. It doesn't get pulverized on the way down
- Since the upper part is pulverized into dust,
there is no pressure from above as buildings progressively collapse
- Fireball from WTC 2 crash is double the size if
all of full 767 fuel load is combusted at once. Smoke cloud is 1.8
million cubic meters. One cubic meter of kerosene expands to 10,000
cubic meters, requiring 180 cubic meters of kerosene. Full load on
Boeing 767 is 90 cubic meters. Flight 175 was carried a half load
sufficient to fly to the West Coast.
Breaking
NEWS (January 31, 2003) Just discovered by Henrik Melvang, Denmark
A New Video Discovery from "ABC?" - shows that a journalist man (and a
female ABC-journalist!?) are running up the street - away from the WTC,
and finally ends up hiding behind a car .
QUESTION: Why did they run away from the WTC ?
The Media showed this video on Sept.11 and told us all , that these
persons on the video ran away from WTC because the Tower had just begun
collapsing. That is a Lie !
FACT: They ran away because they heard an explosion and saw the dust cloud
from this detonation taking place at STREET LEVEL.The dust cloud came from
a bomb detonated at the Street Level (or below) - and certainly not from
the falling Tower debris ! (Because at this point both towers were still
standing)
MEDIA COVER UP: The media did not play the original soundtrack of these
BOMBS being detonated. The Medias CENSORED both the PICTURES and the SOUND
of this particular clip.
EVIDENCE: I have seen this "run away journalist clip" mixed into other WTC
collapse sequences. Both ABC/CNN and many other TV stations made this
fake-mix. That is EVIDENCE of FRAUD !
They are deliberately FAKING the video record and the TIMELINE of the WTC
events !
PROOF: I found a special version of the Clip were the "editors" forgot to
"cut away" in their "video mix" ,...... which mean that in a second or two
at the end of the Clip,.....the camera is "panning from behind a Car," and
in the direction from North towards South,..............and there you go:
BOTH TOWERS are STILL Standing TALL !!
CONCLUSION:
They were NOT running away from falling Tower debris No, they ran away
from,........ a Huge BOMB detonated at STREET LEVEL !
TIMELINE EVIDENCE # 2:
Another Clip with huge dustclouds from the PRIOR EXPLOSIONS at the WTC
STREET LEVEL - also shows People running away from the WTC
MEDIA-MANIPULATION of videoclip #2 :Also this clip was FAKED by the MEDIA.
They did not want the TV viewers to understand that this was an additional
Street-Explosion.
This clip#2 showed a Dust cloud from a BOMB detonated at Street Level. But
the medias mixed this clip ALONG with OTHER collapse Sequences - so that
they FIRST showed the Tower collapsing with debris falling , and then they
MIXED IN and "put in" the said "other Clip#2" along with their COLLAPSE
sequences. (That is deliberately faking the evidence)
Consequence of this Manipulation: All the TV viewers were manipulated to
believe that the people they saw running on the street were running away
from the falling TOWER debris. But they were not
They were running away from a BOMB just being detonated at Streetlevel.
PROOF: I have measured the DURATION of the clip (in seconds) and the
EVIDENCE is indisputable. If we compare with other video clips from the
Real collapse of 2WTC then we can prove that the "real debris-cloud"
generated from the Tower collapse filled the "NAMED Street",.... totally
with smoke from debris in less than 5 seconds. ( I can tell this for sure
because I followed an AMBULANCE moving in the Streets,.......the ambulance
arrived just as the 2WTC collapsed
and the driver managed to back away,............before the debris cloud
hit it. My calculation is indisputable and correct) WATCH the video !
On the OTHER clip (That with the Explosion) the firefighters and other
spectators had more than 25 seconds - before the CLOUD reached them. And
you can even see a man with a camera ,....WALKING BACK TOWARDS the DUST
CLOUD ! He walked back because this Dust cloud was not in rapid motion.
Around him were numerous of other persons who did not run away. Had this
been falling debris - then the cloud would have hit them in less than 5
seconds. Eyewitness have explained that the dust clouds from falling Tower
debris created a rapid "dust speed" of up to 50 mph close to WTC. But the
clip#2 dust cloud moved very slow because it was not caused by falling
debris.
FACT: The real "Tower collapse DEBRIS Cloud" was in rapid motion when it
hit the street. Some say that it went as fast as 80km/hour (No man can run
that fast) But the "dust cloud from the EXPLOSION" (clip#2) in contrast
was VERY slow and not dangerous at all, because nothing had collapsed yet.
CONCLUSION: This clearly shows that the FBI/MEDIAS covered up that BOMBS
were detonated at street level, several seconds (or minutes?) BEFORE the
collapse !
The government/media approved version of events insists that the fires in
the World Trade Center burned so hot that they caused steel supports to
melt or at least buckle, thus triggering a total collapse of the towers.
This is a strange theory for a number of reasons:
1. The architects who designed the World Trade Center designed it to
withstand the direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial airline crash.
Aaron Swirsky, one of the architects of the WTC described the collapse as
"incredible" and "unbelievable." Jerusalem Post. WTC
Architect: Collapse "Unbelievable". By Michael Meyer and Stuart Winer.
September 12, 2001. Google users enter: swirsky collapse unbelievable.
Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said: "I designed it for
a 707 to hit it. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity comparable to the
767." American Free Press. Eyewitness Reports Persis of
Bombs At WTC Collapse. By Christopher Bollyn. December 12, 2001. Google
users enter: bollyn bombs lee robertson
2. The history of high-rise building fires provides no case histories of
buildings collapsing due to steel beams melting from a fire.
3. The collapse of both towers were both perfectly symmetrical and
methodical. The straight down collapse was identical in appearance to a
well engineered, controlled implosion. A demolition company could not have
done it better. Now that we know that all one has to do to bring a tall
building straight down is set a fuel fire in it, the well trained experts
who work for demolition companies should all be out of a job by now!
Even a layman with no explosives background should be able to see this.
But many specialists in the explosives and structural engineering have
also made this observation and commented on these inconsistencies. After
the WTC collapse, the Vice President of New Mexico Tech, Van Romero, gave
an interview to the Albuquerque Journal. He stated plainly that he
believed that the WTC collapse was too methodical and that explosive
devices must have been placed in key points of both buildings. Romero
said:
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event
like that. It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives
placed in strategic points. One of the things that terrorists are noted
for is a diversionary attack and a secondary device."
Albuquerque Journal. ABQjournal.com. Explosives planted in towers,N.M.
Tech Expert Says. By Oliver Uyttebrouck. September 11, 2001. Google users
enter: romero explosives planted tower
In that same interview, Romero revealed that he was in Washington DC when
the attacks took place. He and a colleague were there to discuss defense
research programs for New Mexico Tech. A few days after his interview,
Romero abruptly changed his opinion and told the Albuquerque Journal that
he no longer believed that bombs brought down the towers.
Albuquerque Journal. ABQjournal.com. Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed
Buildings, Expert Says. By John Fleck. September 21, 2001. Romero,
who relies upon the Pentagon for funding, had suddenly flip-flopped and
joined the "melted steel" theorists.
There is more than just my own common sense and Romero's expert opinion to
support the belief that the towers were imploded from within. Several
witnesses and survivors reported hearing bombs going off inside the World
Trade Center. Louie Cacchioli is a firefighter with Engine 47 in Harlem,
New York. Cacchioli told People Magazine the following:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in
position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We
think there were bombs set in the building." People
Magazine. People.com United in Courage. September 12, 2001. Google users
enter: people louie cacchioli 51
Now this whole controversy between the "melted steel" scenario and the
detonation scenario is one that could be very easily resolved. All we have
to do is dig up the steel beams and examine each and everyone of them. If
an explosive device caused the steel to fail, there will be tell-tale
indications for the engineers to see. But if it was intense heat that
caused the steel to "melt" or "buckle", there will be tell-tale signs of
that as well. All we have to do to put an end to this controversy is to
closely examine the steel. Right?
Well, don't hold your breath. That's never going to happen. Thanks in
large part to Time Magazine's "Man of the Year 2001", New York Mayor Rudy
Giuliani, the steel beams were quickly recycled before investigators even
had the chance to look at them! A media darling and lifelong supporter of
Israel, Rudy Giuliani made sure that the "smoking gun" evidence was
destroyed and right quick too. Much of the steel was recycled in America,
but an additional seventy thousand tons of WTC steel was sold to Metals
Management - a New York company with a Jewish president named Alan Ratner.
Ratner then turned around and shipped the WTC's steel to China and India
for recycling! Reuters News Service. World Trade Center
Scrap Sails for India, China. By Pete Harrison and Manuela Badawy .January
21, 2002. Google users enter: world trade center scrap sails
China Radio International's English Edition also reported:
"New York's Metals Management is among the firms taking steel from the
huge project to clear Ground Zero. The company says it has bought 70,000
tons of scrap from the ruined twin towers. Some of the scrap has been
shipped across the Pacific to Asian, including China and India. Among the
consignments of scrap are the "very dense" steel girders from Ground Zero,
which could finally yield 250,000 to 400,000 tons of scrap for recycling." Chinese Radio International. January 2002. Google users
enter: cri online world centre trade scrap
Imagine that! The largest criminal investigation in history and the
investigators weren't even permitted to see the most important evidence of
all - the steel! During the time that Rudy and Ratner the Recycler were
destroying evidence, many of the most respected engineers in the country
complained not only about the recycling, but also about the Federal
government's suffocating control of their investigation. On December 25,
2001, the New York Times ran a story about the frustrations of some of the
engineers who were called in to study the cause of the collapse:
"Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which includes some of
the nation's most respected engineers, also uncovered complaints that they
had at various times been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that
prevented them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster site
and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to the
police and fire departments..." New York Daily News.
Firefighter Mag raps 9/11 Probe. By Joe Calderone. January 4, 2002. Google
users enter: joe calderone firefighter mag raps
They made their concerns known publicly. Bill Manning, editor of the 125
year old Fire Engineering magazine, noticed a strange difference between
the WTC investigation and other major fire investigations in New York
City's history. Manning wrote:
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire?
Did they throw away the gas can used at the happy land social club
fire?...That's what they're doing at the World Trade Center. The
destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately."
Ibid
Bill Manning continued:
"Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official
investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil
Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by
political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield
of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a
three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE
investigation committee members- described by one close source as a
"tourist trip"-no one's checking the evidence for anything."
One investigator told the New York Times:
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the country working on
this, and our hands are tied," said one team member who asked not to be
identified. Members have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to
the press. "FEMA is controlling everything," the team member said. New York Times. Experts Urging Broader Inquiry In Towers'
Fall. December 25, 2001. Google users enter: times experts urging broader
inquiry into towers
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at the
University of Maryland told the New York Times:
"I find the speed with which important evidence has been removed and
recycled to be appalling." Ibid
Finally, the Times story made this interesting little revelation about
Rudy Giuliani:
"Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral
requests for comment over a three- day period about who decided to recycle
the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the
investigation.." Ibid
It is a very odd form of science that the government and some of its house
scientists practice these days. Without a shred of physical evidence,
these modern-day alchemists have been able to "prove" their theory fire
caused the towers to collapse. This appears to be yet another monstrous
lie. Why else would you destroy the "melted steel"? Ask Rudy.
UPDATE:
Feedback from the Progressive Review's Undernews for April 22, 2004.
WE
RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING from someone who worked for Fiduciary Trust on the
90th, 94-97th floors of the South Tower:
"On
the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2,
the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical
supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this situation
since I work in IT and had to work with many others that weekend to ensure
that all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ... and then brought
back up afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for the power down was
that cabling in the tower was being upgraded ...
"Of
course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on
doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower. I was at
home on the morning of 9/11 on the shore of Jersey City, right opposite
the Towers, and watching events unfold I was convinced immediately that
something was happening related to the weekend work."
San Francisco Indymedia | April 23 2004
The world gets crazier and crazier everyday, doesn't it? The world that many
of us thought was there, isn't. The bottom has dropped out of everything. The
illusions have been revealed, we have found out who has been pulling the strings
behind the scenes. Millions have lost their jobs, have mortgage
problems, and
foreclosure. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been
taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild
dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government
of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit
me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its
laws." Get
the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system.
It's all about 'commerce'. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for
each individual. Not only does this end
personal debt, it places the people first in line
as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for
you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study. Is
your credit rating bad for reasons that seem out of your control? There are
ways of credit repair,
so you can men those broken fences too. Do you want to keep your children protected
from outside forces, there are ways of protecting
your children. Do you want
to keep your sons and daughters free from 'the draft'? Check this out.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses,
and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site
range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives.
We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can
grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric.
These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present
multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. If
you have more information on a certain subject that verifies it, challenges
it or make a comment on it, please e.mail
us.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
 |
|
