The Sheeple Analyst: Do-Si-Do Takes Two to Tango


Sheeple Analyst: You can download Michael Moore's film on the internet and then burn it.
That should give you some satisfaction. Moore: pirate my film, no problem (4 July 2004)

Mr. Sheeple: Just because I do not agree with Micheal Moore's film, why should I download
it and burn it? I am more mature in thinking than to peform, or even
advocate, such childish thinking and action as you suggest! Your statement
below is as absurd as your message the other day bitching about my alleged
hatred, just because I expressed my objection to Moore's film rather than
slobber all over it as you apparently do because it reflects that on your
thinking as per your website. Niether Moore's film or your website content
is of interest to me.

Sheeple Analyst: Just a joke, Dick. You seemed to be so steamed up about Michael Moore, I thought a good catharsis was called for. I didn't even suggest that you watch it. You don't have to read a book to be able to burn it. Just get the satisfaction of burning that which you have decided is evil. Or not. Didn't have to get so intemperate about it. That just shows how deeply you are at the affect of whatever.

Could you document for me what I might possibly have said to give you the illusion that I was slobbering all over Fahrenheit 911? In fact, Moore runs counter to much of what I have been telling you for the past 2 years. See, that's the language of hate in which you make up something about me that has nothing to do with anything I had said or done to warrant such a comment. It's your own mind that's churning out the hateful images. Lumping me with Moore is your way of excusing yourself from ever finding the truth. You've made up your mind ahead of time despite evidence to the contrary. THAT'S PREJUDICE and the seed of IGNORANCE.

On the other hand, although I can document that Newsmax and WND are frequently far afield from the truth, I still go there to see what has you so worked up. And when I come away from that amazing experience, I have a treasure trove of lies, innuendo, and disinformation. You could apply the same attitude of inquiry to my website or, for that matter, Michael Moore. It seems, though, that you are fearful of losing your programmed ideology. It's rather like a vampire avoiding the light because he knows that he cannot survive in truth. Your world cannot withstand the light of truth so you must fight constantly to find the dark places of the soul. It is a Faustian bargain.

And I wasn't bitching, although you probably preferred to hear it that way--easier to dismiss. I was observing a trait that seems to keep you immobilized in the ideology of your current choice. Hatred is the means to build the walls that give you false comfort. Such a fear of reality stunts and deforms. But everyone gets to choose how they will use this life.


Mr. Sheeple: Just an item to show you that WorldNetDaily addresses both sides of the issues vs your "alternative" sources that bash the right but support the left. Yes, Republicans disgust me to a degree, as well, because they have departed from conservative principles of the past and moved somewhat to the left.

WorldNetDaily Why Republicans disgust me

Sheeple Analyst: You can't seem to comprehend the difference between advocacy of an ideology and the no-holds-barred search for truth. I've listed some of my "alternative" sources so you could easily see that what you imply about my sources is a bald-faced lie. I've come to expect that of you, however. It is part and parcel of the baggage of the Zionist criminals and traitors who have taken over your party. The Zionist criminals and traitors in the other party use the same dishonest techniques.

WND here only castigates Specter for his "liberal" leanings. This is certainly not what the title represents. It certainly does not examine the failings of the Republican party to hew to their conservative roots. It's just another attack on a fellow Republican who doesn't seem to wish to be a gay-basher. WND's homophobia and leering attacks on sexual variants contradict the old standards of conservatives: individual rights and the right of privacy.

The people you call Republicans are more often, than not, Zionists and neoconservatives who have taken over the Grand Old Party. Look to their credentials and writings and see how they are neo-liberals who saw an opportunity to use the tools of the international revolutionary movement of Trotsky, a Zionist, to accomplish their goals.

  • They no longer stand for the supremacy of the states over the federal government. That became abundantly clear in December 2000 when the US Supreme Court overruled the State Supreme Court of Florida over an issue that the Constitution reserves for the the states.

  • They no longer stand for fiscal responsibility. That became abundantly clear with the budget busting spending in the past 3 years that has brought the American economy to the brink of dissolution. Our chapter 11 bankruptcy is about to become chapter 7: receivership. The IMF has already given notice.

  • They became interventionist and terrorists in the Reagan-Bush years and carried out the same crimes against humanity for which eleven NAZIs were hung fifty years ago. Only now the charges are not ex post facto as they were then. The doctrine of pre-emption was made a capital crime by the international tribunal

  • They established a modern day Gestapo and gave it police powers that would have made Hitler jealous. The GOP majority have fought hard to maintain those powers even though they are clearly destructive of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Now they are searching for new ways to increase those powers rather than tempering them in light of their oath of office.
    They use racial and ethnic stereotyping to inflame their constituents to hate and fear Muslims and use the hate language of Zionists to manipulate public discourse.

  • Their course is socialism, not individualism; big government, not small government. They represent the National Socialist head of the same New World Order monster in mock battle with the International Socialist head represented by "progressives" It is all the same beast.

These are not the actions of true conservatives. "By their fruits you will know them" is a very useful reminder these days. These are NOT conservatives. They are agents of the New World Order working in mock opposition to Democrats who represent the other head of the monster. The illusion of opposition provides a morality play to entertain and distract the unaware who have been conditioned, programmed to follow without question, using the fear and insecurity of world events, which they have choreographed together, to lead them to seek security and protection under one of the opposing ideologies. Depending upon the inability of their sheeple of the left and right to think beyond their emotions or to see the monster among them, they will saw back and forth between ideologies to fell the giant that was America.

The only route to freedom and independence is between, over, and around the choices provided by the Illuminati to trap the goyim into submission and degradation. Caught up in the bickering and hysteria Americans will lose what has taken the blood and sweat of their ancestors to create. Then the world will fall under a great darkness. Now is the time to choose life. Or not.


Mr. Sheeple: Then, there are sins of commission. If DCI Tenet knew in the fall of 2002 that Saddam Hussein had no nukes or chembio weapons and was not a threat to us, yet assured President Bush the opposite was true, shouldn't he fell bad enough to resign? WorldNetDaily Tenet's 'slam-dunk'

Sheeple Analyst: Why are you moping around Tenet? Bush said he had full confidence in him. Just face facts once in your life. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and others LIED. And you struggle to maintain a silly belief that he didn't.

Mr. Sheeple: "Bush said he had full confidence in him"
Yep, had full confidence in Tenet. That was a mistake! Had Senate Democrats not balked at confirming Bush's anti-terror staff to replace Tenet and other useless Clinton leftovers until late July, Clinton leftovers who proved ineffective during 8 years of Clinton, perhaps history would have been different. Bush should have also dumped the CIA and FBI leftovers intent on domestic "terrorism" (of Branch Davidians, Ruby Ridge, Elian Gonzalez etc.) and missed the clues leading up to 9-11 and also failed to get bin Laden three times

Sheeple Analyst:Hey! Hey! Hey! Now you would blame democrats for Tenet who has Bush's stamp of approval? Get honest with reality! Bush has had many opportunities to replace Tenet.

And just look at that hate man go! Hate Clinton! Hate Clinton! Hate Clinton! Hate Clinton! Little wonder you think people are Bush haters just because they object to being lied to.. Your life revolves around your hate. You're even so arrogant and self-important that you think everyone should hate like you do. If you weren't so spineless you would be a dangerous goon on the New World Order goon squad cuz you love to hate. Hate Clinton! Hate Clinton! Hate Clinton! Hate Clinton! Hate environmentalists! Hate environmentalists! Hate environmentalists! Hate liberals! Hate liberals! Hate liberals! Hate nature! Hate nature! Hate nature! Hate truth! Hate truth! Hate! Hate! Hate! Hate! Pphhewwww! What a stench.

Mr. Sheeple: No, it is time for you to get real!!! I sent you an item several weeks ago, concerning the fact that Democrats in the Senate held up confirmation of Bush anti-terrorist appointees until late July of 2001, after becoming President as of January 20th when inaugurated as with all Presidents! Democrats held up the confirmation process just as they did with Bush's federal court nomineess such as Mr. Estrada who had the misfortune of being an Hispanic the Demos did not like. Instead of responding, you dissmissed it with more of your negative, biased and insulting rhetoric. I'll find it and email it to you.

Their thwarting of the judge nomination process is the subject of the current memogate problem now facing the Democrats because it might blow up in their face! I will find it and send it for your edification.

Sheeple Analyst: The Dems held up Estrada JUST because he was Hispanic? That's a lie. He was not well trained for the federal court and had ideological problems that were offensive to their constituents. They had every right AND DUTY to object to Estrada. It's in the Constitution, what's left of it. It's called "ADVISE AND CONSENT." You don't remember that from your excellent 50's education? That was put into the Constitution to create a "SEPARATION OF POWERS" that would provide "CHECKS AND BALANCES." Otherwise the Executive Branch would be in sole charge of the Judicial Branch, remember? If I insult you when you try to slip a lie or half-assed opinion from your hate-mucking WND or Newsmax, don't do it again. I'm just throwing your muck back at you. I don't want it.

I had already responded to this tirade, but you couldn't read it again. Let it slide and now you get huffy because I didn't respond. Take responsibility for your short attention span, short term and long term memory loss, reading disability, or whatever mental dysfunction that messes up your learning process.

Did you get so self-righteous when the GOP was holding up Clinton appointments? No, you have an ideology to defend with whatever it takes a la Machiavelli. You have learned deviousness, dishonesty, lying, defaming, and slandering from them or someone else?

Mr. Sheeple: Why do you always think in terms of political polarity? Though I voted for Bush as the lesser of two evils as options does not mean I blindly and automatically accept his policies and stand behind him in every facet!

I fully disagree with his amnesty program to placate El Presidente Fox and take in all the illegal aliens flooding into the country because Fox wants to get rid of them. I am also upset that Bush has not had the courage to veto spending bills and insist that the Congress cut back on spending. Otherwise, they are no different than the "Tax and Spend" Democrats of the past.

As a nation, we should enforce our immigration laws and control the borders as other countries do. Then, for Fox to get his own economic house in order and provide for his people. I have an email correspondent in Mexico who thinks the same way. He is an American who has dual citizenship, teaches English and is married to a Mexican woman. He writes frequent columns on the subject.

Sheeple Analyst: I don't think in terms of political polarity. I describe YOU in terms of political polarity because of your demonstration of political polarity. Thousands of your words are proof of that. You expressed your total admiration of his intelligence, honesty, business acumen and defended him against the most glaringly obvious, sock-in-the-nose lies, crimes, and treason. A more polarized person could not be imagined short of those whose pockets are awaiting filling. You did, however, allow that maybe the USA PATRIOT Act was a bit of a threat to the Constitution. Only recently did you seem to start wondering, just a little bit about what might be done. Then when I answered, you tossed it without looking.

And yes, the Republicans are much worse than any Democrats of the past, creating a far deeper budget crisis than any since the Great Depression brought on by the Illuminati. They've cut taxes while in the midst of fighting two wars, rebuilding two nations we had destroyed, ballooning to half a trillion dollars deficit in a single year on top of two previous deficit years. Not only tax and spend, they CUT taxes and spend, giving bonuses to their rich cronies in stereo.

Mr. Sheeple@f................ wrote: Wrong, cuz. I have repeatedly stated I saw Bush as the lesser of two evils because government has grown too big. Clinton had bragged about an era of smaller government but it grew during his 8 years, and Bush had spoken in favor of smaller government but he has failed to veto any spending and bureacracy-creating bills but has failed to deliver.

The growth of government and excessive government spending began with Lyndon Johnson's infamous Great Society with a socialist incliniation refledting Marx's infamous "Great Society" visions that collapsed economicially in '89-'90 with collapse of the former USSR. Before the '60s, government was smaller, living costs less where people lived quite well though minimum wage was $1.00 per hour, average annual income was $5,500 and a could be purchased for $10,000 but the official poverty level today is $10,392 for a family of four. RHB

Sheeple Analyst: Well, your political independence is certainly a welcome revelation. Till now you only grudgingly acknowledged that perhaps the USA PATRIOT Act was a little bit destructive of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That's been it, till now. Your comments that Bush failed to deliver on cutting spending and creating a smaller government are new to this playing field. I will willingly accept your new non-polarized political position. The greatest looting of America did not occur under the Great Society of LBJ, but with deregulation and the looting of the savings and loans by the cronies of the Reagan/Bush Administration, including Neil Bush and Jeb Bush, George's brothers. You might have heard of the Silverado Savings and Loan. If you are really not polarized, you will find this very eye-opening: Chapter 20-The Leveraged Buy-out Gang

During the entire decade of the 1980's, the policies of the Reagan Bush and Bush administrations encouraged one of the greatest paroxysms of speculation and usury that the world has ever seen. Starting especially in the summer of 1982, a malignant and cancerous mass of speculative paper spread through all the vital organs of the banking, credit, and financial system.

Now we can perhaps begin looking at how the Supreme Court has refused to overturn a lower court decision that established California's most stringent state law regarding gun registration as the national standard, effectively eliminating the Second Amendment. The same five. appointed by Reagan/Bush, who established that a state may not apply its own laws for an electoral recount have decided not to hear this case and therefore destroyed the Second Amendment. This adds to amendments 1, 4, and 6 amendments that have been taken away. This United States is becoming very quickly, an oppressive, dictatorial state such as the one that ignited the American Revolution--by Illuminati design. You are still placing the blame for inflation and rising living costs in the wrong place. When a bank can take the credit of your promissory note as its own asset and monetize it 9 times its original value without adding anything to national productivity, that is hugely inflationary. Doing that for nearly a century can readily be the primary, if not sole cause, of inflation and economic instability. There are several articles on The Seventh Fire that address this from an historical and economic standpoint. I have Eustace Mullins book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve on the Politics and Society page and a lecture by E. Griffin, the author of The Creature of Jekyll Island. We are addressing these issues, in part, by our debt elimination pages. Today I will probably add more on the UCC-1.and its impact on our sovereignty. While the Illuminati had you distracted fighting socialism and big government, the banks were looting the economy. Of course, you weren't the only one distracted and the corporate news media were surely not going to let you in on the news of the heist. This is a criminal activity going on demurely, out of sight, in your neighborhood bank and few people have a clue. But we have remedies and tools to end that oppression nonviolently.....if you are interested. Go to: /debt_elimination/debt_elimination.htm

Mr. Sheeple: In case you have yet to figure it out, this is the message I sent you last night in which I copied and pasted a paragraph from your "sheeple analyst" website item and responded to it.

Sheeple Analyst: Sure I figured it out. That wasn't hard. Now when you figure out that you just wasted my time and yours going around the tutti fruiti express for the past several days because you couldn't read my words without creating legends in your own mind, seeing a question to you as a statement of my position instead of question to you, we'll be in good shape again. Then you can get back on track with what the issue was from the git-go and respond to my statement about jobs being exported by corporations and our government irrespective of educational preparation.

Hopefully, we can stop the sidestep game and all the babbling that comes with it and be directly responsive to the issue on the table. THAT'S where the focus was lost. Had nothing to do with your focus on educational reform. It referred to our conversation which I initiated about the exporting of jobs and sought a response from you about that. You lost the focus and I still haven't gotten a decent response from you about that. I believe those facts I presented demonstrate that there is a bidding war for jobs for political and economic ends having little to do with educational preparation. It doesn't make educational preparation less important, it just makes it irrelevant as far as the outsourcing of jobs is concerned. All you would have to do is say, well, that seems to make sense OR show me another interpretation for those facts OR obtain another set of facts that proves the fallacy of the first set of facts. That's how an honest intellectual discussion would proceed.


Sheeple Analyst sent: Hello, I think the following article will interest you:

20-12-2003
Daughter of slain Iraqi opposition leader says in 1993 US helped Saddam to quash coup attempt

"He may be a son of a bitch, but he's OUR son of a bitch," they used to say.

Mr. Sheeple@f....... wrote:
Hell, Bush was not even President then, and your main beef is against Bush and the Republicans while making casual anti-Clinton-Democrat comments. You seemed to support the Democrats in 2000 when you bitched about the supreme court allegedly giving the election to Bush and ylou have been on an anit-Bush tirade since while saying little or nothing about Democrats.

There are many instances of the U.S. meddling in foreign affairs with the resultant backfire. Kennedy and his administration engineered the assasination of Diem in Viet nam before the Viet Nam war, to cite one
example. RHB

No YOU believe my main beef is against Bush. It's YOUR legend in your own mind that gets you off the track all the time. You haven't been paying attention to my bipartisan finger-pointing because it doesn't fit YOUR story about me. And believing YOUR story about me facilitates getting far afield from the discussion instead of remaining focused on the issues. That way you don't have to deal with the lies and propaganda you swallow and spew. Here I present you with bipartisan evidence that Clinton policy was a continuation of the New World Order agenda of Reagan and Bush I, carried through to Bush II.

Instead, you only seem to understand playground ethics of choosing up sides instead of looking objectively and rationally at the real facts of history and contemporary politics. Look how you continually bring up the tiresome old tirade of how I was unhappy with the pResident being appointed by five Supreme Court Justices his father had appointed earlier by their ruling against a state following its own statutes for conducting an election. So much for the Sovereignty of states within a federal system. It was Sovereigns who empowered their political construct, a State, to form a Federal Government in which the powers of the Federal Government are sharply limited.

My position had little to do with the person selected to be pResident and everything to do with the principle of a limited federal government. I would have thought such an honored conservative principle would be well established in your world-view, but your loyalty to party over the US Constitution over-ruled that. Party was and is more important than principle for you and indicates the status of your moral compass.

So instead of dealing with the facts you shift the discussion into a polemic about me. That's a tawdry switcheroo that's about as honest as a Halliburton contract. Even attacking your story about me is out of place in an honest, intellectual, objective, rational discussion. You've become so steeped in the methodology of the rabid commentators that you fall readily into the mode that they use all the time to divide and enflame. This is also the agenda of those who are delivering the dictatorship of the New World Order.

And you are correct that Kennedy intervened in the government of other nations and triggered the assassination of their leaders. Assassination is a time-worn crime of the Illuminati agents of both the Democratic and Republican Parties, but that is off the track of the facts I exposed for you. I provided evidence that Saddam was a patsy of the Zionist traitors of this nation and was under their protection even while their rhetoric was castigating him as a villain on a par with Hitler and Stalin. This evidence of the lie in that rhetoric should not be beaten down with lies, innuendo, and outright mythologizing.

Do you have a moral compass and, if so, where is it pointed?

In case you haven't noticed, the undercurrent of this discussion is HOW you twist and turn instead of confronting the facts and realities head on and without prejudice. Can you remain principled, honest, ethical, and moral in a headlong no-holds-barred search for the truth? Can you think critically about your own thoughts and beliefs? Can you examine your motives and feelings without getting caught up in them, reacting instead of determining right action? Do you have the courage to be honest with yourSelf, honest to God? Can you stand in the midst of turmoil and uncertainty and know WHO you are is not at the effect of a sea of "what" masquerading as reality? Can you watch yourSelf writhing in agony as "what" tries desperately to hold on to "what" is not real and is only the game played for the benefit of WHO?

Mr. Sheeple@f........ wrote:
Well, it is true! Bush has been your main complaint. You sure were upset following the 2000 election when you complained about Bush allegedly being given the election by the supreme court and you initially had nary a bad word about Clinton. in fact, you even defended him.....especially when I expressed irritation that he was fooling around with Lewinsky and you replied that he could F... anyone he wanted to! Of course, you are going to deny ever saying that, but the emails went when I went to windows 98, so cannot retrieve them. Ah, the hell with it

Sheeple Analyst: It's really difficult getting this through to you but you keep saying why dwell in the past cuz nothing can be done about it. That's your excuse for not looking into the past for the patterns. Well, you can look for patterns in the past but although Clinton is part of that pattern, he is no longer the President and he is no longer creating policy. So he isn't on stage at the moment and Bush is. Is that too hard to understand? You are the one dwelling on the past in a way that ensures that nothing can be done about it.

Clinton will remain in focus for me as he fits into the larger pattern of the unfolding New World Order. In fact, he plays quite a role in Project Monarch information that I've published on my web pages this past week.

But Bush is center stage right now and what he does has an immediate impact on America. Clinton is nonetheless working behind the scenes but we can't always ferret out what is happening there. We can only look at what is before us and that's George Bush. And you can't defend George Bush just by pointing into the past and crying about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski. We have a mess here and now that is connected to that past. We have to clear the head of the stupid loyalist cobwebs, stop the silly partisan bickering and get down to First Causes, real facts, real effects, and use the most objective, logical, rational, critical thinking we can muster. Our freedom depends upon it.

So get a clear head and understand this. I focus on George Bush because he is now the pResident in charge of the New World Order on center stage and therefore the clearest manifestation of that New World Order.

I don't have to deny anything about what I've said about Monica and Bill. I've already explained my position about consenting adults vs Project Monarch sex slaves but you haven't paid attention to that and keep on the same silly prattle that I've already answered to. If you haven't the moxie to play this game with all your wits, then you shouldn't pretend that you can. Read and respond to what I say, not what you imagine I say. Don't keep bringing up issues that have been addressed. If you haven't the time or energy to read my responses, you don't have the time or energy to write an email to me. It's that simple. If you keep getting caught up in your emotions, you get off track anyway and that is tiresom and pointless. What you see as anger is simply being clear and direct. If it pains you, look for why that is. You will find that I am not the cause. I'm not angry with you, just impatient at telling you so much from my knowledge, experience and more and repeating it over and over just to have you come back with the same argument as though I had not addressed it.


Mr. Sheeple sent:

Clinton's dalliances may have been very costly

Sheeple Analyst:

There you go again, trying to change the past. It's too late, you can't do that. You told me that. So why are you violating your own belief... other than it is convenient to misdirect your enemies. And clearly you see me as your enemy. I show you the holes in the threadbare ideologies that you cling to and that threatens your emotional existence. You prefer to believe the lie rather than know the truth so you can do something about it. I tell you to learn from the past so you can understand the patterns. But no, you don't wish to learn from the past, just use it as ammunition to shoot down your opponents. Too bad. I wear a "ghost shirt" and your ammunition never touches me. When a person knows the patterns and can see behind the illusions, the ammunition is all illusion. And so is fear.


The Communist Party USA and the Revolutionary Communist Party had a nasty ideological split years ago as one faction lined up behind Moscow and the Soviet Union and the other with and China's Mao Zedong. They still have violent disagreements over goals and tactics, but they agree on one thing. Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" rules.

"The movie is a documentary that the American people themselves are a part of," explained the paper. "It follows the dark history of the Bush administration, hatched from the rotten egg of a stolen election. It shines a light on the dark corners of the Bush family's brazen disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of African American voters in Florida, the Bushes' early - and oily - alliance with the ruling Saudi families, including the Bin Ladens, and the unspeakable toll on America's working-class families." WorldNetDaily_Moore's_film_gets_rave_-_from_Communists

Guilt by Association again. Brazen propaganda technique to stir you into action. Such propaganda crap about a crappy propaganda film. Don't you have something useful to do? Does Michael Moore frighten you that much? Does losing your lying, war monger Fuhrer make you feel less secure? Well, the other guy will be a pretty good liar and promises to mong war. He'll destroy a lot of people too in bringing "democracy" to the world. He'll rape the Constitution and Bill of Rights with a bit more panache' but that's the job of an Illuminati agent. Don't worry, things can't get too much worse under Kerry except for his label. Whomever wins the sham election will likely lead us quickly into a deeper tyranny. As long as you keep watching the shills cavort, you won't notice your pocket is being picked. And it IS being picked. Sheeple are such dumb animals. Carnies would call them "Rubes" and PT Barnum said one is being born every minute.

Mr. Sheeple: A "crappy propaganda film" that reflects exactly that which you have been claiming for the last 2.5 years? Moore could very well have been reading your website. I find it amusing that you called Moore's film a "crappy propaganda film", but when I express a distaste for that same film in a previous email, you replied by accusing me of HATE! Doesn't your question below (Does losing your lying, war monger Fuhrer! ) constitute HATE?

You are contradicting yourself. Is it Hate only when I express my beliefs, but not when you express yours?

"Guilt by Association again. Brazen propaganda technique to stir you into action. Such propaganda crap about a crappy propaganda film. Don't you have something useful to do? Does Michael Moore frighten you that much? Does losing your lying, war monger Fuhrer! make you feel less secure" (From previous email regarding Communists loving Moores movie)

"And your support for Reagan and Bush makes YOU an accomplice, unwitting, of course, but that's the nature of being sheeple.(from this email: Isn't this also GUILT BY ASSOCIATION?

Sheeple Analyst: Hate is an emotional state induced by fear, lies, and disinformation. Is there a "nice" way to say that Bush is a liar? "Liar" is not necessarily an emotional, inflammatory descriptor when the evidence demonstrates that it is true. If it can be demonstrated that Bush has lied, then "liar" is a logical descriptor. Of course, Kerry is a liar, Moore, Clark, and many others on the left are also liars. The hate articles about Moore that you have presented even use language that are irrelevant to an intellectual discussion such as "fat" and "ugly" which only are personal attacks on Moore's body and demeanor. As such they are used to derogate Moore's physique. I hope you can see how that is hateful. I've addressed this directly before. I'm disappointed that you didn't learn it then.

If you look up the definition of warmonger in the dictionary you will see that it has real use in description. I use "warmonger" in its proper context and with facts to support its use. Without facts, the use of the word, "warmonger," WOULD be an emotional, hateful word. I've done my due diligence in gathering and presenting the facts. Therefore, I don't HATE Bush, I just reveal his true nature by his actions and his words. That's easy to do in your case as well.

I have been telling you for the past two years... and more... about the Arab hijackers not being a proven allegation. You don't seem to hear that. You won't allow it into your frame of reference even to examine the hypothesis carefully and honestly. YOU think that the contents of my website conform to the Arab Hijacker Conspiracy Theory but you are 180 degrees wrong. That's how much you REALLY know about what I present on The Seventh Fire. NOTHING. Just hot air from your fevered imagination creating a legend in your own mind.

The difference between the way I describe Moore's flick and yours is that I back it up with facts and you just bring on opinionated bluster and baloney from the right. You describe it as "expressing beliefs." But yours are backed up by opinion and mine by facts. You don't seem to see the difference.

Guilt by association is much different than guilt by support. If you are in the same theater as Saddam Hussein, that does not make you a sadistic criminal. On the other hand, if you promote, advocate, and support the criminals who in turn promote, advocate, and support another sadistic criminal, you ARE linked and guilty as an accomplice to the sadistic torturer and murderer. You helped Reagan and Bush gain their office, maintained support for their regime, and advocated that others join you in this support. Therefore what they did is blood on their souls and blood on yours. You can change this. But you likely will rationalize it by trying to vilify me, the messenger, or simply forget it as an uncomfortable proposition. Right action is always your choice.


Mr. Sheeple: "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Sir Winston Churchill 1874-1965

Sheeple Analyst: Yes, you sent that two weeks ago and I told you then about the connection of Churchill to the Fabian Socialists. You objected to learning something at the time, remember?

Mr. Sheeple: So? Apparently, Churchill renounced the Fabian Socialists if he had such a negative comment about socialism. His comments were certainly not in support of them!!

He also condemned socialism as per Russia, when he stated in a Speech in Missouri that a "huge iron curtain has fallen over Eastern Europe", meaning the socialists were walling in the people to prevent them from succumbing to the "decadent" Western influence, and to prevent envious Westerners from flooding in and ruining the socialist economic utopia that was going to exist. Only problem was that guards were shooting people trying to escape rather than get into the Eastern block behind the wall. As West Germany prospered, the Eastern segment behind the walls (Eastern Germany and Berlin in the Eastern sector suffered economic problems due to failed socialism. Obviously, government controlling and managing the economy does not work.

Sheeple Analyst: You assume that politicians say what they mean? Little wonder you choose as you do. Do you even KNOW what Fabian Socialism IS? FDR's program was Fabian Socialism. Eisenhower was CHOSEN to follow in his footsteps, his career rising meteorically once FDR had identified his eventual protégé. The fact that one is Democrat and the other became Republican matters not at all.

The monster that is devouring the people of the world always has two heads. At one time it is communism vs capitalism, then it is left vs right, liberal vs conservative, then it is Islamic vs Christian. This monster has an easy time demolishing its competition because they can always be brought to fight each other and when they have bloodied and exhausted themselves, they are ripe for domination. Until you can see that you are at the effect of the monster, flailing against whichever enemy is so designated by the monster's agencies.

Incidentally, I apologize for the impertinent laughter at the discovery that the dozen untested munitions were NOT WMD. It was a momentary impulse to laugh and so that's what I sent in the message. That was not kind, nor was it helpful to the dialog if that is even possible. For some reason you just can't seem identify the truth when the lie is so obvious as to be laughable. The laughter was not so much at you as at Newsmax and its genre. Newsmax gets everybody super righteous and anticipating a victory celebration over the unbelievers... and then the facts are made known. But believers of the lie just pull up their socks, pick up the balloons and decorations and wait for the next salvo of joyous news to salve their stout, hopeless loyalty to the liars..

BTW: Churchill plagiarized the term, "iron curtain."

Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.

This is a crazy world. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer, told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws." Get the picture? Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for each individual. Not only does this end personal debt, it places the people first in line as creditors to the National Debt ahead of the banks. They don't wish for you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really are in A New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study.

Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information.

Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. (attributed to Voltaire), but certainly embodies what the 1st amendment of the constitution refers to as the freedom of speech

American Gold and Silver Currency is Back. Click here for the Liberty Dollar at a Discount.

Bill of Rights

Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 


 






detnal discount program

Is the high cost of quality supplemental health care getting you down? Are you one of 7 out of 10 Americans with no Dental saving program? Look no further...it is now possible to access affordable dental, vision, prescription and chiropractic programs for your entire household*. MORE

* DISCLOSURE - This is not insurance. The Plan provides discounts at certain healthcare providers for medical services. The Plan member is obligated to pay for all healthcare services but will recieve a discount from those healthcare services who have contracted with the Discount Medical Plan.


illum image
The Illuminati have nearly completed their agenda and this is the Final Warning: The History of the New World Order by David Allen Rivera
See also Child Sexual Abuse
  

What are stem cell enhancers? lessons in stem cells
There is now an all natural, plant based extract, patented in 2004, and identified as a stem cell enhancer. The patent states that this natural botanical and its extracts support the release of adult stem cells from the bone marrow and into the bloodstream where they can then circulate throughout the body, helping to maintain the body's own Natural Healing System

Kay, owner and webmaster

 

To contact the webmaster
please click on the dragonfly.



Tunguska Blast Banner  

 

Queen Victoria is back and she is amused!  This time she's not taking HeRself  ....or anything... seriously.  HerStory Cont.

The most effective CANDIDA DEFENSE product available. This proprietary formula is teeming with live bacteria that start to work right away to help rid the body of tough Candida organisms.
email us or visit this site: ghtdirect.com/KARA

PUT YOUR BANNER OR ADVERTISEMENT HERE.

WE HAVE up to 6,000 VISITORS A DAY!
CONTACT US FOR PRICES

 

 

     
 

 

 
Debt Elimination
Accelerated Mortgage Payoff
Facing Foreclosure
Eliminate Credit Card Debt
Eliminate Student Loans
Eliminate Tax Liens and
tax help

UCC1
Credit Repair
Draft Freedom
Family Protection
Family Charitable Foundation

should all candidates for office be required to pass 6th grade tests and have physicals, which would be reported to the public?
No, I just want to trust they are smart and well
yes, we have a right to know
yes, and they should not be allowed to run for office unless the pass all these tests
yes, and those tests shoud include psychiatric exams
  
pollcode.com free polls
Join The Energy Revolution-Days 

 

Sheeple Analyst Talk

911, Conspiracy and Illuminati
Bush Liars' Club
Choosing Evil
Conned by the Neocons
Defending the Indefensible
Do-Si-Do Takes Two to Tango
Fall of the WTC
Holocaust History
Laura Demos Stepford Lying
Outsourcing America
Partisan Politics, Propaganda
Peace through Strength Lies
Religion, Rights, Civility and NWO
Righteous Joe from WND
Role of Force in Libya
Roving Curveballs on Clarke
Shining a Light on the Illuminati
The Haters
The Tutti-Fruiti Express
WMD Lies
Zionism vs Jews



9/11: Malfeasance or Treason
9-11, Satanic Power of the NWO
911: The Road To Tyranny
Africa
America's Empire of Bases
How US Schools Create Sheeple
Iraq, Afghanistan: Illegal Wars
Israel and Zionism
Latin America
Nick Berg and 9-11
Peak Oil-Myth or Reality
Seventh Fire News Archives
Skull and Bones
The Lies of the Past
Unbridgeable Chasm of Doubt
US Debt Clock
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Who Died and Who Lied
Why Do They Hate Us?





9-11 and the Mossad
Abu Nidal- Mossad Terrorist
False Flag Attack on the USS Liberty
Israel's Deliberate Attack on the U.S.S. Liberty
Zionism as Jewish National Socialism
Mossad Deception and Murder  Mossad tricks US Attack on Libya
Mossad Uses Islamists
Most Treacherous Jew
Murder of Robert Maxwell
Marines Not Warned by Mossad
D id Six Million Really Die?
Hamas Is a Creation of Mossad
Hamas history tied to Israel
Israeli Roots of Hamas Exposed
Hamas Gang Is Tool of Sharon
Zionist-Israeli Roots of Hamas
The Israeli Spy Ring
Israeli Mega Spies
Turning over Stones Finds Mossad
Zionist Connection to 9-11
Protocols of the Elders of Zion
Mind Control (Audios)
Battle for Your Mind
New World Order
Freedman on Zionism
Myron Fagan's Expose'
Secret order of the Illuminati
Silent weapons for quiet wars
Egyptian-Masonic-Satanic Connection
Freemasonry - Mystery Religions
Crowley, 33° Mason, Human Sacrifice
Egyptian Mystery and Masonic Lodge
Satanic Ritual Abuse


We are a nationwide association dedicated to providing honest legal advice, counsel and reform in every state.  OUTLAWS LEGAL SERVICE provides information about the true nature of the law to everyone that seeks to educate and free themselves from the abuse and corruption that is rampant in the courts and slowly destroying America.


Did FEMA know 9-11 attacks were ahead when this was published in 2000?


Survivor  In 1942 a US Navy destroyer was shipwrecked off Newfoundland. Of the few who survived, one man, Lanier Phillips, was black. The rescuers, never having seen a black man before, tried to scrub his skin clean and white. This is a story about growing up with fear in segregated Georgia, enlisting in a segregated navy, facing death in the icy North Atlantic, and a rescue which galvanized a man to fight racial discrimination.  Listen to Survivor with Real Player


Remembering Kent State 1970  When thirteen students were shot by Ohio National Guard Troops during a war demonstration on the Kent State University Campus on the first week of May 1970, four young lives were ended and a nation was stunned. More than 30 years later, the world at war is a different place. However, those thirteen seconds in May, 1970 still remain scorched into an Ohio hillside. Through archival tape and interviews, Remembering Kent State tracks the events that led up to the shootings.  Listen to Remembering Kent State 1970 with Real Player


War Comes to Twin Peaks explores the rumblings of protest at home during the 1991 Persian Gulf War. From a priest who takes up the anti-war protests, disillusioned war veterans, and a mother who fears for her son as he departs for service, War Comes to Twin Peaks shows us the varied human faces affected by administration policy. Their stories strike a familiar chord as the United States again confronts the possibility of war with Iraq more than a decade later  Listen to War Comes to Twin Peaks with Real Player


  Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Exposed  RealVideo (streaming) :: (37:01) The Biggest Game in Town exposes the two-tiered accounting of all federal, state, county governments. Find out how the issue is confused by focusing on the budget and not discussing the investments. There is no reason for continued taxation.


  Aldous Huxley: The Ultimate Revolution, March 20, 1962 
RealAudio (streaming)  A recorded lecture (UC Berkeley 1962), of Aldous Huxley Brave New World on the subject of "The Ultimate Revolution." He talks about using terrorism to create willing slaves out of the population.



Audios About 911

To Listen to Meria Heller
Archived Interviews - Click Here

Kyle Hence of UnansweredQuestions

 Nafeez Adhmed "War on Freedom"

Mike Vreeland

Mark Elsis Interview on Questioning September 11th

Mark Elsis Interview on NORAD's Press Release

Jeff Rense: Michael C. Ruppert and Mike Vreeland Interview

Jeff Rense: Kristina Borjesson Interview
"Myth of a Free Press" (start at 1:00)

Edward Said on Terrorism

Noam Chomsky: Afghanistan / Terrorism


Play Biowarfare: Looking in the Mirror (58:00)