Mr. Sheeple:
The views of Micheal Moore, yourself, and the liberal left are left over
from the hippie era. A time when it was naively believed that peace could
come in the world if the United States disarmed and disbanded the
military, because the U.S. as a strong military power was the reason for
world conflict. That fallacious premise has existed since the U.S. ended
WW II in the Pacific by dropping the atomic bombs to end the fracas that
Japan's imperialistic tendencies began with bombing Pearl Harbor.
The fallacy of that premise could readily be proven by acting on a smaller
scale by disarming and disbanding of police forces on the premise that
crime is caused by an armed police force. But the result would be
increased crime due to a lack of opposition. For centuries, British
"bobbies" were not armed, but had to be armed due to growing crime
problems due to criminal types acquiring firearms and putting the cops at
a disadvantage. If an armed police force is essential to preventing
criminal activity as social violence, then a strong military is essential
to prevent others from attacking and trying to conquer the United States.
Like Reagan, Bush believes U.S. can change world for better
Sheeple Analyst: Peace was not invented by hippies, dick. The
belief in peace predates hippie culture by millennia. You should know
that, but the opportunity to promote your anger at hippie culture is
irresistible when you emulate the polemicists who write your favorite
gospels of hate and fear. The concept of peace is likely as old as the
concept of war and the war-like people who were kicked out of Asia for
their constant aggression have now obtained ascendancy in much of the
world. These Khazarian people were forced by their king to adopt Judaism
as their state religion, whether they liked it or not. But their king saw
it as a useful political tool. He was right.
You haven't found out yet the real reason the atomic bombs were
dropped and your ignorance shows. You haven't found yet the real reason
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and your willful ignorance is legendary. On
these fallacious premises your logic fails. Perhaps you could provide
evidence that shows my information is incorrect instead of refusing to
confront the foundational issues for your excusing crimes against humanity
and state terrorism.
The war with Japan started with economic manipulations and embargoes by
the United States. It only came to physical attention with Pearl Harbor.
Seeing war as only bullets and bombs is a simpleton's definition.
Further, the assertion that Japan started the war at Pearl Harbor would
not justify the terror attacks on Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki. That is
a simpleton's rationalization. If a classmate had shoved you and you
retaliated by killing him, no moral person would see your act as
justified. The US was NOT justified in launching terror attacks against
civilian populations of Tokyo, Hiroshima, or Nagasaki.
Surrounded and impotent, an embargo that had been suggested would have
brought the Empire of Japan to its knees in a short time without
significant casualties on either side. Emperor Hirohito had already sought
peace talks with the Allies in July 1945 on terms that were later agreed
to by Macarthur.
The nuclear arms race and proliferation began with the demonstration of
the willingness of the US government to incinerate hundreds of thousands
of innocent people. Any country with the means to protect themselves
understood that they needed a nuclear deterrent against that threat.
So you have never noticed the threat of nuclear extinction from the US
government and for you that is only a mirage. Your viewpoint is blindered
by ongoing programming and censorship in the media, the schools, and
churches. You don't KNOW what many people around the world have
experienced and for you it doesn't exist. Remember that a human brain is
but an organic computer that can be programmed with the appropriate
software.
Once again, the fear that drives you to seek evermore protection and
security is a personality disorder that usually arises from childhood
traumas and can be mediated by psychotherapy, even self-psychotherapy,
re-parenting.
Mr. Sheeple: There you go, in your rationalizing and
condescenind attitude. If you would bother to read in context, rather than
from your perspective, you would realize that I simply addressed the
hippie attitude of the '60s when they naively believed that peace would
exist if only the United States would disband their military and disarm. I
gave you the analogy based on the fallacious premise that preventing crime
in the form of aggressive people engaging in criminal acts will presumably
be alleviated by disarming and disbanding police forces. Geez
Sheeple Analyst: "The views of Micheal Moore, yourself,
and the liberal left are left over from the hippie era".
Yes, you addressed the hippie attitude... in your usual rationalizing and
condescending manner. You also associated Michael Moore, the liberal left
and me with the hippies and each other. That's stereotyping, guilt by
association and contorted generalization. Oh, I DID read it in context,
alright. There's no slithering around that black and white statement. If
you had "simply addressed the hippie attitude of the '60s" you would not
have lumped Moore, liberal left and me with each other and with the
hippies. You lie when the truth is self-evident. "No Mommy, this is not a
cookie in my hand!" Maybe you got away with such phony deception when you
were a child but I'm not going to pamper you like that. You will be honest
and truthful or I will put it right under your nose so you KNOW that shit
stinks.
And you could stop speaking of peace as though it started with the
hippies. If you behaved as though you understood something I wouldn't have
to remind you about the truth of reality. After your difficulty with the
rate of free fall and the cockamamie history of the founding of Israel,
it's hard to guess what you really do actually know.
You haven't demonstrated yet that you understand the nature of the Khazars
and their impact on history of the world, or the nature of the decision to
drop the A-bombs on Japan, or even the documented history of the
manipulations that lead to Pearl Harbor. On these fallacious premises your
logic fails. Perhaps you could provide evidence that shows my information
is incorrect instead of refusing to confront the foundational issues for
your excusing crimes against humanity and state terrorism....instead of
whining that I misunderstood you and I hurt your feelings. GEEZ!!!
Mr. Sheeple@f....... wrote:
In the aftermath of the Gulf War, the IAEA discovered that Iraq had "gamed
the system." In Iraq's 1996 classified report to the IAEA, Iraq had
admitted it bought items from Germany, Britain, the United States,
Switzerland, France, Japan, Italy, Sweden and Brazil that ought to have
been "declared," but weren't. Hence, the IAEA had no way of determining
that these undeclared items were employed during the 1980s in a program
intended to produce nuke-useable highly enriched uranium.
The above, and the url below, refer to a column by Gordon Prather, a
Nuclear Physicist retired in Chicago. I have previously exchanged emails
with him. RHB
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36339
Sheeple Analyst wrote:
I've exchanged emails with you, too. So what? There is no WMD. There
is no evidence that there was WMD prior to the March attack and there is
ample evidence of low priority in securing WMD sites after the attack.
There is no evidence of WMD in ships sailing hither and thither, no
evidence that the trucks were manufacturers of WMD. Several of the
aircraft found hidden were never in Iraq according to Janes' and the
drones found did not have the range to travel very far. Chemical WMD does
not last very long. Yellowcake was never available for purchase from Niger
and the aluminum tubes were inappropriate for uranium-processing
centrifuges. Doctor Seuss is dead but the Cat in the Hat lives on. Fiction
usually has a longer life than reality.
Mr. Sheeple@f............wrote:
This column reflects my thinking on the matter. Failure of the U.S. to
respond would only embolden the anti-US powers and result in more and
greater attacks. It is an illustration of the neighborhood bully ANALOGY
where no one can mind their own business and live in peace until all gang
up and deck the bully. Appeasement did not work to prevent WW II !
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36323
Sheeple Analyst: Everything he said was documented lies. Right down to FDR and Pearl
Harbor...except for the bully description of "respecting" us for our
strength. I can see where that makes you and people like you "proud to be
an American" so in their impotence and emasculated frustration they and
they and you can feel the masculine juices rising to go out and kickass.
Never look to see if they have any verifiable evidence or if there are any
gaps in their conspiracy theory, just grab the glib line and run with it.
But you aren't aware yet of the hook, can't recognize it for all the flash
and flutter. Then when you least expect it, the hook is set and another
stupid fish has been caught. No brains or intellect, just another
sub-reptilian knee-jerk reaction. Dumbed down to the leve of the lower
vertebrates. Impressive.
Mr. Sheeple@f......... wrote:
A militarily strong nation is the only way to keep others with
dominating and conquering tendencies from trying to take over the United
States. The U.S. made that mistake of disarming after WW I, which was "the
war to end all wars". Prior to WW II, when Hitler was rustling around in
Europe, the potential danger was not recognized. But when Pearl harbor was
bombed and Hitler declared war on the US prematurely due to their Japanese
ally jumping the gun, the US miltary was in a weakened condition to the
point where soldiers were training with wooden rifles, field guns etc.
until war production of our factories could be brought about. Clinton was
a known anti-military President who loathed the military, and as a result
did not react with much potential force to "feeler" acts by terrorists
against American interests abroad. This only encouraged terrorists,
especially when Clinton cut and run in Somalia with the fiasco as
Mogadishu when bin Laden believed that America was vulnerable and would
not put up much of a fight. Ghadafy of Libya has suddenly dropped his
anti-US stance and wants to be nicey by dropping his nuclear weapons
efforts and WMD while urging others to do the same. Why, he even owned up
to flight 103 bombed over Lockerbie, Scotland! Now, Ghadafy is offering a
great deal of oil that the U.S. needs not only as fuel to power the
economy but also as a source of raw materials. With out oil, you would not
have tires, fan belts, generator belts for your SUV. Niether would you
have the need plastic housings for your "high tech" computers. Niether
would you have food on the table with out petroleum for lubrricants, fuel,
tires, belts, hoses for farm equipment.
Sheeple Analyst: Your analyses are based on erroneous facts. You seem to explain that
WWII happened because the US was weak. That is a painfully blindered
vision of what and who caused WWII and why. It was all orchestrated by
those Illuminati you claim to know so much about. They intended to weaken
German, British and French colonialism and make them vulnerable to giving
up still more power and wealth to the international robber barons,
establish the nucleus of their one world government in the UN, and make
the case for a Zionist homeland in Israel. By the 1930's, the United
States was in the midst of the Great Depression thanks to their
manipulation of the money supply. Most of the world was affected deeply by
the Great Depression.....except Germany. Browns, Harrimans and others
funneled their depression profits into the rise of Germany and the NAZIs.
Prescott Bush was the managing director of the Union Bank through which
the profits were channeled to Hitler. This cash flow was not staunched
until 1942 when the US Government seized the Union Bank because of the
Trading with the Enemy Act.
The mood of the country could not be manipulated without a "foreign
attack" on our soil. That Franklin Delano Roosevelt through the US Naval
Intelligence planned, manipulated, facilitated and hid the Japanese
invasion and impending attack is well-documented today, even without the
full disclosure of classified Top Secret documents 62 years later. When you
are ready to learn the truth, it is available. There is no point in a
lecture on what is now known about the events that lead up to Pearl
Harbor. I've already covered that months ago. It's available when you
decide to be an independent thinker and search for the truth.
Clinton did exactly what the Illuminati wished for him to do, including
providing a lightning rod for angry protests by conservatives so that they
would be totally satisfied when a new regime was "voted in."
Now the Bush regime has stepped on a land mine with Qadafi. He has offered
to eliminate WMD if others in the region do so. That would include Israel.
Fat chance!
Oh. Yeah. Oil is quite necessary for our economies to continue, except
that we are already on the downside of the reserve supply.
This is a crazy world. What can be done? Amazingly, we have been mislead. We have been taught that
we can control government by voting. The founder of the Rothschild dynasty, Mayer Amschel Bauer,
told the secret of controlling the government of a nation over 200 years ago. He said, "Permit me
to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who makes its laws." Get the picture?
Your freedom hinges first on the nation's banks and money system. Freedom is connected with Debt Elimination for each individual. Not only does
this end personal debt, it places the people first in line as creditors to the National Debt ahead
of the banks. They don't wish for you to know this. It has to do with recognizing WHO you really
are in A
New Beginning: A Practical Course in Miracles, an informational study.
Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.
The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information.
Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. See full legal disclaimer
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. (attributed to Voltaire), but certainly embodies what the 1st amendment of the constitution refers to as the freedom of speech
Bill of Rights
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Queen
Victoria
