Sheeple Talk: Analyzing the Bleating
|
|
|
A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.- Bertrand de Juvenal Mr. Sheeple: "What really happened here, I think, is President Clinton's greatest mistake was Monica Lewinsky," Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., told "Fox News Sunday." NewsMax Sheeple Analyst: "And that forced
him to take his eye off the ball. He lost the ability to lead
the nation to take some of the action that [White House
terrorism czar Richard] Clarke was suggesting." Mr. Sheeple: A timeline of events chronicled in the Starr Report shows that during the period of late January through March 1996, Mr. Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky was then at its most intense. Sheeple Analyst: Here we go again,
old farts lusting after lascivious imaginings of sex with young
women. From the behind-the- scenes information available to you
on my website you would discover that Bill Clinton was a regular
participant in sexual adventures with young women, young men and
boys. Monica would hardly be a blip on his dipstick. Sexual play
for Bush, Reagan, Robert Byrd, Clinton and other Project Monarch
handlers is a casual, mundane event that would hardly cause a 10
minute pause in the daily routine. Mr. Sheeple:
Sheeple Analyst: This should guarantee only that there will be more false flag operations. They work very well to manipulate and frighten the sheeple. Since there is far more evidence of bin Laden as an asset of the US CIA, and far more use of "al Qaeda" as a false flag operation by the Mossad, there is little doubt that these illusions will be used again. Scoff? Only at your stupidity for being constantly flim-flammed and proud of it. I don't scoff at the use of "bin Laden" as a bogeyman and "al Qaeda" as a tool of world conquest by the New World Order. I've been telling YOU about that for a long time and you just scoff. Sending Arabs to flight schools to fly Boeing 767's by flying Cessnas is their way of making fun of the buffoons who think that such a simple skill is readily transferable to the highly sophisticated technology and difficulties of scale is reasonable. Living like a cartoon of real life is the fate of those who fall for the demonic Mr. Sheeple:
Perhaps it is now time for you to do your "homework". Many flight
schools do not only teach "how to fly Cessnas", as you naively
assume. Although learning to fly begins with small planes, but
they graduate to multi-engine aircraft after a specified number of
hours of flying, then go to small jet aircraft and finally qualify
for 767s as with all pilots flying large jets. How do I know? I
know someone who is a flight instructor and a commercial pilot.
And, a friend of mine who died a couple of years ago was a retired
airline pilot who flew 747s for United. Sheeple Analyst: The closest those "Arab flight students" got to any jet was a time or two in a simulator. Check out your naive assumptions before you mouth off. It just makes you look dumber than a post. Of course, they teach people to fly jets in flight schools, but they didn't teach jets to the "Arab" students. DO SOME HONEST RESEARCH BEFORE YOU REPLY. I AM BORED WITH YOUR IGNORANCE AND DISGUSTED BY YOUR STUPIDITY! Mr. Sheeple: Sheeple Analyst:
Nooooo, oooooh daffy dickie duck. The flight school at Venice
Airport did not have a flight simulator and the evidence is that a
few of the misnamed flight students had very little experience on
a flight simulator....like once. Would twice on a simulator make
you a certifiable commercial pilot of a heavy? Many commercial
pilots work their way up flying smaller commuter craft, cargo
flights, and as their proficiency and their experience increases
they might be deemed ready for the heavies. Don't be silly trying
to convince me that a few classes in a flight school, a few hours
on a simulator is enough to successfully maneuver a heavy with the
skills shown by the flights of 175 and 77. It's also strange that the FBI confiscated all the records of the flight school and that has not seen the light of day in 2 1/2 years, just like the disappearance of other forensic evidence like the steel of the WTC.
9-11 showed the face of the NWO Mr. Sheeple sent: Perhaps you need to contact Dr. Allawi who may know more of the facts than you do. NewsMax.com Inside Cover Story Plainly miffed that Dr. Allawi hadn't accepted the U.S. media's attempt to cover-up links between Saddam, al Qaida and 9/11, Brokaw reprimanded him as cameras rolled: "Prime minister, I'm surprised that you would make the connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq. The 9/11 commission in America says there is no evidence of a collaborative relationship between Saddam Hussein and those terrorists of al-Qaida." But Dr. Allawi refused to back down, telling the top TV anchor: "No. I believe very strongly that Saddam had relations with al-Qaida. And these relations started in Sudan. We know Saddam had relationships with a lot of terrorists and international terrorism. Now, whether he is directly connected to the September atrocities or not, I can't vouch for this. But definitely I know he has connections with extremism and terrorists." Sheeple Analyst: Facts? What facts? "I believe very strongly." Is THAT a fact? ".whether he is directly connected to the September atrocities or not, I can't vouch for this." Is that a proof of a link to al Qaeda? Strong opinion or belief is not proof. The people of Iraq know Dr. Allawi as a CIA asset, a former associate of Saddam Hussein. They know that, like the Iraq Governing Council, Allawi had been installed by the occupying forces, a puppet of the United States. What then would you expect of such a man....truth? You listened to Chalabi through the mouths of Perle, Veith, Rice, Wolfowitz, Cheney, and Bush..... and got lies. The mobile labs finally identified as hydrogen generators for artillery balloons. The Nigerian yellow-cake fraud exposed to the derisive chortling of the rest of the world. Colin Powell embarrassed himself before the UN with "proof " that was not proof and rationale that was without basis in fact. The' Bush Liars' Club has become the laughing stock of the world and the American sheeple are seen as hopelessly muddled and ignorant. To save face you must make excuses and rationalizations: "Well, they are in ships sailing about the seas." "The Iraqi WMD is now in Syria." "The Iraqi WMD is in Iran." "Well, they were thinking about it!" "Nigeria has oil; THEY must have Saddam's WMD!" 15 months later and still no REAL evidence. Dr. Allawi just says so. You cannot let the REAL truth show you how gullible you have been so there is always whining and babbling and raging when I point out the inconsistencies, lack of evidence, lack of logic. I've watched you grasp at any straw to save your precious ideology. Why not make your ideology the unfettered search for truth no matter the cost? Such allegiance to an ideology and an authority typically stems from one's childhood in which something stopped the normal development of a fully functioning adult. Such sheeple need authority figures to provide them assurances and security in a world that frightens them into submission as a feudal serf. There is a way out, but you prefer the comfort of your chosen ideology and favored icons. Truth is an inconvenience in such a world. Now you are salivating over the words of another liar like a little puppy. You haven't even proved al Qaeda exists but for covert actions of Mossad. Israelis pretending to be Arabs tried to set up an al Qaeda cell in Palestine and got caught. Israelis pretending to be Arabs have been involved in many covert actions that lead silly sheeple to believe that the perpetrators are Arabs of al Qaeda. You think I am any more interested in Allawi's "facts" than I was in Chalabi's?
You know that we told you before! But you didn't hear us then! You don't get something for nothing, you won't get freedom for free. You won't get wise with the sleep still in your eyes, no matter what your dreams might be.... Neal Peert (Rush) says it well Mr. Sheeple: Even Newsweek, an establishment media often critical of Bush and pro-liberal Democrat, disputes Moore's allegation that reflects your past allegations in your emails when you asserted that Bush was in cahoots with the Saudis via the Carlyle group. How do you now explain this? Rationalize this claim as "lies", but accepting other Newsweek "establishment media" comments opposing Bush but fitting in with your views? A central theme of Michael Moore's controversial documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a bare allegation that Saudi Arabian interests provided $1.4 billion to firms connected to the family and friends of President George W. Bush. However, as a special Newsweek investigative report notes, there is really less - not more - than meets the eye re the dramatic Moore claim: Newsweek Moore Distorted Bush Saudi Ties. Sheeple Analyst: I guess you just needed someone to yell at and you figured that I would be an advocate of Michael Moore or his movie. I came out against Michael Moore with his support for General Wesley Clark nearly a year ago. I've written you about my differences with the Moore take on 9-11 over a month ago and identified those who babble about al-Qaeda and Arab terrorists, such as Richard Clarke and Sibel Edmonds, as disinformationists. Michael Moore actually supports, wittingly or not, the next wave of aggression after Iran and Syria, which will be directed toward Saudi Arabia. Broadly, he supports aggression against Muslim nations, perhaps without intending this. I'm hardly what you could reasonably call pro-liberal or pro-Democrat since those positions typically are following the Al-Qaeda and Arab hijacker line slavishly. I won't tolerate either Tweedledee or Tweedledum propaganda. So why all the tooting and whistling? Are you afraid your Daddy authority figure might be attacked and you would lose your security and protection? Take your Michael Moore polemics elsewhere. I've already shown that Michael and I are not political brothers. I've been expressing my differences with him long enough that you should have noticed the differences. I do not accept that there were Arab terrorists aboard Flights 11, 175, 93 and 77 since that has never been proven and ample evidence proves the null hypothesis. It has also not been proven that the above mentioned flights were directly involved in crashes at the WTC and Pentagon. Therefore, the entire line of investigation into 9-11 is taken into an examination of a False Flag Operation intended to do just what Michael Moore is doing with Fahrenheit 9-11: direct attention toward Muslims and specifically Arabs. Therefore all the talk about bin Laden, Saudis, Carlyle, etc is a misdirection. I'm not fooled by the propaganda ploy. I was caught by the Saudi misdirection at first but began to see a pattern developing that was obviously a slick propaganda trick...and I've been telling you about that for a long time. You've forgotten,,,, or was there so much partisan noise in your head that you couldn't hear what I was saying...or didn't read for comprehension? Jeez, you get excited with all the partisan blockheads screaming at each other that you figure you ought to scream at someone, too. Wake up and watch the silly Looney Tunes and Scary Melodies. It's a scream. Mr. Sheeple: Interesting that yourself and Micheal Moore both cite the allegation that Bush authorized the departure of the Saudi Royal family, at a time when all aircraft were grounded, due to the alleged Bush ties to the Saudis in various money deals, especially regarding the Carlyle Group. The Carlyle concept has also been shown as fiction, as well. Now, Richard Clarke, whom you quoted in a previous email as presenting anti-Bush administration evidence, claims that he alone authorized the flight for the safety of the Saudis. Of course, you will rationalize this concept in some manner by claiming that Clarke is lying, though not lying when Clarke's comments conviently support your views.
Former White
House terrorism czar Richard Clarke, who served as a principal
source for conspiracy filmmaker Michael Moore's movie "Fahrenheit
9/11," said this week that the central premise of the film is "a
mistake." "Clarke told the 9/11 Commission the same thing in March, after first detailing the episode for Vanity Fair magazine last August - leaving plenty of time for Moore to adjust his film to the facts as recounted by his primary source." NewsMax.com Inside Cover Story Sheeple Analyst: Not only will I not "rationalize this concept in some manner by claiming that Clarke is lying," I will remind you that I stated weeks ago, while Clarke was still testifying before the 9-11 committee, that it was irrelevant in any case because THERE WAS/IS AS YET NO EVIDENCE THAT THERE WERE ANY ARABS or AL QAEDA ON THE PLANES. Remember? Establish the FIRST premise before attempting to draw conclusions. You could save yourself and me a lot of time and energy just remembering what I have stated instead of trying to make it up. If you read about the Mossad False Flag Ops on my website you would know that I don't buy the Al Qaeda crap. Not that that exonerates Bush, Clinton, Clarke, Rice, Cheney, et al. It just avoids going into a blind alley in the investigation. Mr. Sheeple: Iraqi PM executed six insurgents witnesses. 16-07-2004 Now,
that is one no-nonsense way of dealing with murderous troublemakers and
sending a message. I remembered the image. It even looks a lot like you. Hair is straight instead of curly, nose isn't quite right, but there you are in action. You can frame this if you like and tell everyone you know that you have supported the no nonsense way of dealing with murderous troublemakers and sending a message. I think it really sends a message about what kind of democracy the US planned for Iraq, too. Very effective.
Mr. Sheeple:
IIraq
is now a sovereign entity, and they run their country the way they want. Mr. Sheeple: If violence is all that insurgents understand, they are not amenable to negotiations, then Allawi made his point.
Sheeple Analyst:
Then why did you and your
fellow warmongers bother with Iraq in the first place if they only
understand violence? What was the point of the hundreds of billions of
dollars in costs, nearly a thousand American lives, so far, tens of
thousands of American casualties, hundreds of thousands of Americans and
their families exposed to "depleted" uranium, and untold suffering and
misery for innocent people in Iraq. If that's your analysis of the
situation, they should put you in a loony bin for causing so many war
crimes and crimes against humanity. The video that has not yet been
released shows Americans sodomizing Iraqi boys and their shrieks are the
most difficult.....but apparently not for you. You have shown that you
feel no compassion, no heart, no soul, a spirit dead in lies and dishonor,
hollow and withered. Mr. Sheeple: Why do you regard me as a "warmonger"? The "warmonger" term is that of yourself, and is leftover from the infamous "hippie" era when many naively believed that peace can come from demonstrations that would make potential imperialistic adversaries wilt into peaceful people and avert war. I do not like war, and prefer peace. However, I am of the belief that continued pacisifism in the quest of "peace" is no solution to potential problems whan an aggressive nation and/or people seek to overcome others. Again, I refer to my previously stated analogy ( I assume that you know what an analogy is?) about a neighborhood not enjoying peace when a bully continues terrorizing people and making their lives miserable until the neighbors band together and forecefully deal with him in physical acts he understands. When I first presented that analogy, you naively and ignorantly demanded that I explain when Saddam was a "neighborhood bully", and failed to comprehend the principle I was trying to communicate with the analogy. WW II in Europe perhaps could have been averted had the U.S. and Allies taken preemptive action to destroy Hitler's war buildup in the '30s that was contrary to terms of the 1917 armistice and the League of Nations that was supposed to prevent war as the "war to end all wars"! In this case, the al-Qaeda as Muslim extremists, have vowed to destroy the West as Infidels. Bear in mind that it was the al-Qaeda and it's anti American intent that was behind the first WTC attack in '93, behind the Kobhar towers, U.S. Embassy bombings, flight 800, OKC bombing, the Cole etc Before Bush was even considering running for President, so you cannot attribute that Bush as you do 9-11 out of hatred for Bush beginning with the 2000 election. Sheeple Analyst: So far Bush has not offered a war that you didn't like. Oh, yes, the lesser of two evils, again. Always choosing evil. They've got you well programmed. The word, "warmonger," has much deeper roots than the "infamous 'hippie' era" (Still harping on the hippies. See? One of those childish grudges that you, an adult, just can't seem to shake.). Instead YOU believed all those wars necessary, didn't you. That's your excuse to save face, but you have bought the "peace through strength" lie that sheeple of the right love to bleat. And you can be gulled into believing that a war is the necessary evil. That's been documented. Orwell wrote of the Ministry of Truth that developed the propaganda for the sheeple of Oceania and a Ministry of Peace which prosecuted the wars. Through the use of "doublespeak" they tricked people into thinking and acting on a lie. You believed that a pre-emptive invasion of Iraq was justified and proper on the basis of falsified documents, lies, innuendo, disinformation and political authority. You can be similarly manipulated to believe that ANY war is just and proper as long as your opinion leaders approve. All they have to do is give you semblance of a reason to seek security and you will charge headlong bleating the jingoistic war chant of sheeple of the right. Sheeple of the left think they are justified for a more altruistic reason, but gullible, nonetheless. You also don't have a clue what "pacifism" means since you always use it in the context of "passivism." You also assume that I am a pacifist. But as usual you are clueless. When you presented your neighborhood bully thesis, I asked you to bring the analogy into the real situation with Saddam and you couldn't, wouldn't. It's hardly "naive" or "ignorant" to ask for an application of a principle in a real case to check out its relevance, validity, and reliability. That way I would know if you were applying the principle or using it wittingly or unwittingly as a smoke screen. In that test, the principle failed because it was not applicable to the real world situation under discussion. On the lack of historical understanding you believe that the League of Nations and the Versailles Treaty were just and correct, and therefore Hitler was doing evil by taking Germany out of the banking system of the Illuminati and rearming Germany to protect her against the warmongers that had forced Germans to go through a decade of unemployment, economic disaster, starvation, inflation, and unrest. This is not to advocate or defend but to understand the full context of that time. You COULD read Benjamin Freedman's expose' to understand, but you have not chosen to educate yourself beyond the programming of your youth and childhood. It is you who is naive and ignorant. Hurling those epithets at me are only a measure of your need to project your deficiencies on someone else....me. Pre-emption is one of the acts of the NAZI regime that was adjudicated at Nuremburg, ex post facto, and Germans hung for that crime. You now propose the US should have espoused an action for which the Allies later blamed and convicted the NAZI leaders. That aspect of International Law is now part of the UN Charter to which the US is a signatory. That makes it US Law. For the Nuremburg Tribunal, this law was created and developed by the Zionists of the Roosevelt Cabinet to flay the German leaders AFTER the fact. Now it is not AFTER the fact and anyone promoting pre-emptive aggression against another country is in violation of that law and can be similarly treated. You think you have a moral imperative? You just lowered yourself to the level of the Nazis of 60 years ago. That is the level of naiveté' and ignorance at which your are functioning when preaching your war sermon. It was the Republicans in Congress who thankfully prevented the US joining the League of Nations. The high-sounding phrase, "the war to end all wars," was a lie then and it is a lie now. War is one of the primary tools by which the Illuminati increase their control of the world and its people. As you will have perhaps noticed, the "war to end all wars," didn't end all wars. It just sounded good. It took another war engineered by the Illuminati to bring the United Nations into being. It also took the Zionist Socialists of the Roosevelt Cabinet to grease the skids into the New World Order. Now the Zionist Socialists have seen the opportunity to advance their cause still more by pretending to be conservatives. But the big government interventionism and big government spending expose their true nature....but not to the sheeple. Your belief in al-Qaeda as Muslim extremists desiring to destroy Western Civilization is just as ignorant and naive as in "the war to end all wars" and the rig.ht of pre-emptive attack. You have only been gulled into accepting this concept by the opinion leaders you have chosen to follow. You haven't followed up on the clues I laid out for you because you have a need greater than knowing the truth: you wish to be protected and secure from the angry world. Fear and trepidation rule your emotions and your life. That is how you are led around and herded from here to there like the rest of the sheeple. You are herded into the belief that it is right and just that Afghanistan be attacked to bring terrorists to justice. In the name of your security and tranquility you proclaim the right to destroy lives and other people's property, jeopardize their security and tranquility. But no Osama bin Laden. Over a thousand days later, no Osama. And no proof that Osama did anything to harm you or your country along with plenty of proof that he did not. Then you are herded into the belief that Iraq was endangering your security and tranquility and that it is right and just that Iraq be attacked to bring terrorists to justice. In the name of your security and tranquility you proclaim the right to destroy more lives and other people's property, jeopardize their security and tranquility to serve your fears and trepidation about the world. And there was no threat, there were no weapons of mass destruction, no connections to al-Qaeda, no real liberation, no real democracy, no concern for the will of the people, an occupation, the building of at least a dozen huge permanent military bases at a cost of more than a billion dollars. And now that those two countries have been ransacked, their lands polluted for eternity with "depleted" uranium munitions, their infrastructure decimated, tens of thousands dead or dying, hundreds of thousands maimed for life, and the people humiliated and angry...now you will have your attention directed to Iran, and then perhaps Syria or Saudi Arabia. Like a bull in a china shop you will be frightened this way and that, trampling other people's lives into the dust of despair, disease, and death for your perceived need for security and tranquility. I will not bear in mind Muslim complicity in all those atrocities because that has not been proven and significant evidence, even court records, prove that there is another force moving behind all this that you refuse to look at. You prefer your simple answers, your clash of civilizations bunkum,...the norms of the mainstream media, and conformity with the common sheeple. You have NEVER countered my information about the complicity of the FBI in WTC '93. You have NEVER answered my contention that al Qaeda was conceived by the Mossad, birthed by Brzezinski, nurtured by Bush and Casey, and named by Richard Clarke. You have never answered to my information that shows that Zionists and Illuminati have been behind most of the death and destruction of the past three centuries. You haven't taken the time. You just keep mumbling the same regurgitated programming as your excuse for some really big guys to take care of your safety and launder your security blanket. You read lies and think you have real information. It's you who has an all-consuming hatred arising from your fears and trepidations, the insecurity of an unloved child. When you can get to the bottom of that personal issue, you can stop shifting poison and pain on the rest of the world.. Then you will have come of age as a human being and can begin to discover the wonders of WHO YOU REALLY ARE. Mr. Sheeple: One of those childish grudges that you, an adult, just can't seem to shake.). No, one of those "childish grudes" that you cannot shake in your naive belief that being "nicey" and disarming and use "diplomacy" to settle differences is the solution. You are hung up in the '60s "Hippie" mentality naively believing that a strong military only inspires others to attack and create war. When Clinton lobbed rockets into Baghdad to detract from his Monica affair, when he sent troops into Bosnia for alleged "genocide" that has been under question, you conveniently said little....if anything at all. Apparently, you were quite happy when Clinton disbanded the military to "balance the budget" to the point three army divisions, many navy ships, many airforce flights were cut to the point where the airforce was scavanging parts from other planes to keep some semblence of an airforce. Then, you wailed about an alleged failure to launch planes from Andrews on 9-11 rather than Otis in Massachusets. but you ignored a story a bout the still lack of funds (Bush was president but a few months prior to 9-11) until Bush rebuilt the decimated military and that Andrews was in A"stand down" and the nearest AFB was Otis. But, you blame Bush but emit "nicey" if anything at all regarding Clinton's contribution. Peace through strength is, indeed, a valid concept because a nation strong in military strength, while not an imperial nation, will have potential aggressors thinking twice by taking on the stronger nation. It is analogous to the aggressive neighborhood bully taking on the weaker kids to "exert his manhood" or whatever by beating up kids smaller and weaker than he is. But, he knows better to take on someone who is far stronger and not afraid to use his strength to deck the kid who picks on others. As I noted previously, your fallacious anti-military stance is as fallacious as demanding that police departments disarm and disband on the fallacious premise that a strong and armed police force only encouraging crime that would not exist if there was no such thing as an armed law enforcement body. Your stance is based on a grudge from 2000 and your insistence that the election was stolen and that Gore should have won. I have sent you many stories about many recounts by the New York Times and others who determined that Bush would have won no matter what. But, you do not want to believe that because it is contrary to what you want to believe. You claim to not be loyal to either the Democrats or Republicans, but you sure support the Democrats wailing about "tax cuts for the rich". Sheeple Analyst: I never said that. You've made up another strawman to knock down. I've never said that a strong military would induce war necessarily. Overwhelming strength combined with bully boy tactics with other nations, however, can indeed bring about an arms race, threats, confrontations, and missteps that can lead to destruction. Do you suppose I said little when Clinton was in office could be because I was on the road marketing my dream catchers across the country, had no Internet access, and traveling and living in Europe. How many emails did we exchange in the 90;s? Duh. So you would like to argue that poor George had nary a chance to avoid the terrorist attacks? Here's a short list for you so we can get that "poor George" crap buried with the rest of the latrine: The Bush administration ignored the issue of terrorism from the moment it assumed office:
The Bush administration changed Bill Clinton's policy towards Afghanistan to appease Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and their Saudi backers to promote the interests of oil companies, putting profits for campaign contributors ahead of fighting terrorism:
When appeasement failed, the Bush administration then prepared for war against Afghanistan:
The Bush administration ignored numerous warnings from US and foreign agencies:
The Bush administration failed to take meaningful precautions against a terrorist attack when so many warnings were being issued:
On 911, Bush failed to take decisive action:
To cover up his failures, the Bush administration resorted to stonewalling, finger pointing, and lies about 911: They have continually lied about the extent of the warnings about the 911 attack
Condoleezza Rice said, "I don't think anyone could have predicted that these people... would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile." (5/16/02)
They did everything possible to block an independent commission investigation
George W. Bush himself has repeatedly JOKED about the 911 attack:
With your "peace through strength diatribe" I can see why you like to cozy up to the big boys, given your grievances carried over from childhood. I don't have to be a Democrat to see that there is a favoritism and a lie behind the tax cuts. Sheeple just are so trusting of their leaders. The farmer is their best buddy....until its time to be ........ None of your NYTimes blurbs addressed the more than 50,000 eligible voters illegally removed from the electoral rolls. You only wish to play with chads and hanging chads. That's only a cover-up for the real fraud. You aren't willing to examine the constitutional issues concerning state's rights, an old conservative platform plank, so you just make it into a partisan issue instead of an issue of freedom and liberty under the rule of law in a constitutional republic. You're seemingly more at ease bandying campaign slogans about instead of substantive issues. Nevertheless, you seem to think that I'm being naive and ignorant. Yecccchh! Don't get any of that sheeple do on ME. Ewwwww!!!! And sigh.... you didn't respond to the bulk of my email, just got a few lines down and one phrase caught your fancy.....awwayyyy you go. But you didn't acknowledge my point about me asking you to apply your neighborhood bully to a practical situation to demonstrate how it would work in real life.....nothing. And the definition of "pacifism" vs a definition of "passivism." Guess you still don't know the difference. Mr. Sheeple: Your theory that middle eastern al-Qaeda terrorists were not involved in 9-11, that you believe was a government conspiracy, may be starting to unravel along with Micheal Moore's infamous movie. To claim that the 9-11 commission and this story is part of the 'conspiracy' is stretching matters quite thin, along with expanding to the number of people in on the conspiracy to thousands. Perhaps you need to send your website url to this newspaper, the 9-11 commission and others to let them know how wrong they are and that the allegations on your website will 'inform them of the truth'! This story supports President Bush and what I have stated and believed all along.Iran 'gave safe passage to 9-11 hijackers' - JULY 18, 2004. THE Sept 11 commission's report, due out on Thursday, says Iran may have facilitated the 2001 attacks on the United States by providing eight to 10 Al-Qaeda hijackers with safe passage to and from training camps in Afghanistan, media reports said yesterday. Time and Newsweek - in similar reports quoting congressional, commission and government sources - said Iran relaxed border controls and provided 'clean' passports for the hijackers to transit via Iran to and from Osama bin Laden's camps between October 2000 and February 2001. According to Time, the report also says that Iran at one point proposed collaborating with Al-Qaeda on attacks against the United States. Osama declined, however, saying he did not want to alienate his supporters in Saudi Arabia
Sheeple Analyst: No, it's YOUR theory that
al Qaeda terrorists WERE involved in 9-11.
I only question the Official
Conspiracy Theory because the evidence has NEVER been presented and many
bits of evidence point toward another explanation. Only innuendo
and psychic driving establish it as truth in your mind. Remember that the
mind is but an organic computer needing only software to make it function
properly. And your organic computer has been programmed for your whole
life time to accept the pronouncements of authorities. Now let's look at your logic. People are
allowed to penetrate borders and orders are given to not stamp their
passports. Not putting a stamp on the passports means what? Could mean
that they suspect the people are up to no good but they don't wish to have
an Iranian stamp on their passports. Somebody could get upset and nuke the
country, you know. Then there's this breaking news:
We can't prove Iran-Sept 11 link: CIA Guess the ex-CIA analyst isn't aware of the PR program. Now is not the time to be pushing an attack on Iran. Wait a few more months till just before the election for whatever purpose. Or a little controversy can be used to drive the Iranian invasion idea deeper into the organic computers of the sheeple. (We'll turn that little misleading phrase into a laugh line before long....psychic driving.) Mr. Sheeple: Better contact this former CIA analyst and forward your website url and inform him that he is wrong in his assement that the 9-11 attacks were not by al qaeda terrorists. Former CIA analyst Douglas MacEachin, a member of the 9-11 commission staff, said in testimony last week Iran and its terrorist group ally Hezbollah were linked to the al-Qaida terrorist group. Other U.S. intelligence officials said there is also evidence Iran is linked to the Sept. 11 attacks. According to the officials, two of the hijackers, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, who were aboard the aircraft that hit the Pentagon, had stayed at the Iranian ambassador's residence in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, before entering the United States in January 2001. MacEachin disclosed that the Iran-al-Qaida ties were revealed in the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers residence complex that housed U.S. military personnel in Saudi Arabia. The bombing killed 19 Americans. WorldNetDaily Ex-CIA analyst Iran tied to 9-11, al-Qaida. JULY 18, 2004.
My website is not aimed at the criminals but at those who are ready to
wake up to the truth of the illusion that surrounds them. Truly that is
NOT YOU. You are their handmaiden, doing their every bidding, as all their
mind control slaves do. They say it is true so it becomes true for you,
without substantiation. Disregarding the admission of FBI Director Mueller
that those pictures are not necessarily the "Arab hijackers" you keep
responding as though Khalid al-Midhar and al-Nawaf al-Hazmi were really
there.
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well,
Revealed: the men with stolen identities
July 19, 2004 July 19, 2004 Mossad's litany of blunders reveals a small nation with global ambitions July 15, 2004 NZ imposes sanctions against Israel for Mossad agents trying to steal passports July 5, 2004 NZ PM still waiting for Israeli apology for Mossad attempts to get illegal passports And if you don't wake up this lifetime, you will have to do it all over again until you learn. Ho Hum. Around the wheel of illusion again and again until you recognize the lie and thirst for the truth. Really boring, but there seems to be no other way for you. Mr. Sheeple: Wilson was shocked because, in 2002, he had been sent on an unpaid make-work job to Niger to "investigate" whether Saddam Hussein had tried to buy uranium ore from Niger. Wilson's method of investigating consisted of asking African potentates questions like: Did you commit a horrible crime, which, if so, would ruin your country's relationship with the United States? I have no independent means of corroborating this, so be honest! On the basis of the answers he got, Wilson concluded that Saddam had not sought uranium ore from Niger. Since "Africa" means "Niger" and "British intelligence" means "Joseph Wilson," Wilson realized in horror that Bush's statement referred to Wilson's very own report! Out of love for his country and an insatiable desire to have someone notice his worthless existence, Wilson wrote an op-ed in The New York Times calling Bush a liar. WorldNetDaily Wilson lied, kids died July 15, 2004 Sheeple Analyst: Hate journalism seems to be the hallmark of your favorite news sources. Ann Coulter is just as much a hate "journalist" as Joe Farah. Some of her negative subjective value judgments: Out of love for his country and an insatiable desire to have someone notice his worthless existence, Wilson wrote an op-ed in The New York Times The whole story was already nutty enough to be believed by every columnist at The New York Times. But then journalist Robert Novak revealed that Clown Wilson had been sent as an unpaid intern to Niger by his wife, a chair-warmer at the CIA who apparently wanted to get him out of the house. This in turn provoked our own Walter Mitty to (And P. Diddy told me Britney Spears is out to get me! I'm a spy too!) In response to Wilson's crazy behavior He was also fawned over by embraced by Democratic senators like Jon Corzine of New Jersey (guilt by association, in case you can't recognize the propaganda ploy) Wilson began whiling away his once-empty days discussing fantasizing about how his obituary would read Wilson was an idiot The Senate report on the CIA's intelligence gathering concluded that, contrary to Wilson's statements about his own report, his findings had bolstered rather than undermined the case that Saddam had sought uranium from Niger.(where does it say that? ) he had been tapped for the Niger trip based on his nonexistent expertise and zero credentials, (Where does Ann get documentation for these allegations? Wilson was a career diplomat and former Ambassador to Iraq.) This followed Wilson's assertions that his wife "definitely had not proposed that I make the trip" and his astonishment that anyone could imagine his wife was "somehow involved in this," saying that "just defies logic." (Trying to keep Valerie Plame out of the public eye seemed a more honorable decision than the judgment of the senior White House official who violated the National Security laws.) Merely being an ass shouldn't cause many problems Her fantasist husband calls the incompetent CIA paper-pusher "Jane Bond." (I'm an astronaut!) (Yes, Annie, sweetheart, you are definitely a dumb, mouthy, spacey Mother Theresa spoon feeding hate and lies to the squealing, prepubescent swine who have such deep personality dysfunctions as to need a shot of your venom each day to feel alive and wonderful! -- does that adequately convey the Coulter approach to journalism? The need to see others torn down to satisfy ones own wounded ego is apparently a characteristic that Farah exploits in this most disgusting of journals. Devoid of proof, high on opinion, WorldNetDaily spoonfeeds lies, innuendo, character assassination, guilt by association, disinformation, and pseudo-religious dogma to people whose lives are barren and insecure. "People whose lives are barren and insecure seem to show a greater willingness to obey than people who are self-sufficient and self-confident. To the frustrated, freedom from responsibility is more attractive than freedom from restraint. They are eager to barter their independence for relief of the burdens of willing, deciding and being responsible for inevitable failure. They willingly abdicate the directing of their lives to those who want to plan, command and shoulder all responsibility." ~Eric Hoffer "The True Believer" When you find out what in your childhood created this dilemma of personality disorder, you will have found the key to spiritual advancement for you. No matter what you try to do on the outside of this wound to cover it or make it feel better, there will be no surcease of pain and dissolution. You MUST go inside and heal this to be well and whole. Of course, your defense mechanisms will reject this counsel and rage at the suggestion that you are not OK, but that's ego talking. Until you can calm that hurt, wounded inner child, there will be no awareness of enlightenment in this life for you. DO it. Or not. I DO wish the best for you, in spite of your angry struggle to prove yourself and scuttle what I have to say. That is just your ego railing against the world as it has apparently done all your life with unhappy results. Sound and healthy people don't need the Ann Coulter or Joseph Farah treatment every day to make themselves strong and powerful. Mr. Sheeple: And, I suppose your anti-Bush screeds from the alternative media are not 'hate journalism"? Even your message exhude hate, such as the one the other days suggesting to the effect that I "lay in my crib and watch the mobiles overhead" or something to that effect? I am civil in my comments, but your responses have the tone of a childish rant. Sheeple Analyst: Which anti-Bush screed from alternative media are you speaking about. My sources are quite mainstream as you have been shown time after time. That you refuse to admit the quality of those sources only shows your willingness to lie. The childish nature of your comments and information are documented and clear. From deflecting responsibility onto others, holding grudges for an inordinate length of time, and making up stories in your head to outright lying, slander, and cowardice you cover the full range of infantile behavior. Telling you nicely did not work. Showing you facts, principles and logical analysis did not work. Finally after hearing from you the same old silly rant about taxes and how the economy works I presented a metaphor that would possibly wake you up from your 6 decades of somnolescence to learn something true instead of the same old programming. Perhaps that will work and perhaps not. But then nothing has so far, so no loss. Civil? There is nothing civil about intentionally mischaracterizing what I have said, what I might have said, who I might have supported, and who I associated with. You have filled your commentary with the same type of commentary as Ann Coulter, without true facts, documentation or substantiation, just opinion of the same quality as that which one can obtain from a dog...useless, irrational, illogical, incorrect, and unprincipled. Your legends that your create in your own mind so that you can be on a level playing field are obviously intended to permit an easy victory over an immobile, stupid, ignorant foe of your own design. Sending the intemperate, wrathful tripe that you call journalism is also an uncivil imposition that tells more about you than it does about the content of the article. You began your commentary about my anti-Bush screed without any substantiation of what you are talking about. More ignorant, intemperate, irrational ranting dependent solely upon opinion. Obviously you've lived a long life dependent upon fervent opinion without truth, study, or research to back it up. It's a lazy, nearsighted, blinkered perspective that calls forth no effort and no search for truth. Just search for security and authority figures. Ideology is a framework of beliefs and dogmas inside which sheeple lead their lives. "An ideological cult," Murray Rothbard observed, "has many of the salient features of a religious cult, and essentially the same belief structure: leader-worship, dogmatism, and a hatred of heresy, characteristics the neocons exhibit in abundance. Leader-worship fairly describes the neoconservative theory of the Presidency: the President, as Warrior-King, can order torture, and even suspend the Constitution. As for dogmatism: instead of acknowledging and analyzing the utter wrongness of their expectation that we would be greeted with cries of "Hail our liberators!" by the Iraqis, the neocons are now blaming the disaster on the allegedly flawed "execution" of their policies. Hatred of heretics is certainly an animating force among them, second only to blood-lust." You are a member of a self-satisfied, super-righteous secular cult that applauds conformity to their party line and intimidates those who might wander beyond the narrow parameters of the faith. One marvels at how far the GOP has come down the road of "big government and big spending": their leaders are now calling for an unelected commission to be given absolute dominion over the "democratic" process, and, in effect, granted the power to jettison the Constitution. Once upon a time the Democrats were the champions of administrative law over the formerly constitutionalist Republicans, but the GOP, in this instance, has surpassed them in promoting a National Socialism and huge budget deficits. It doesn't look like the socialism that you hate, but socialism it is, nevertheless. Your ignorance does not cover the truth. The "neo-conservatives" are not conservative and there is nothing new about them. Their roots are Trotskyite socialism and Revolutionary Internationalism of the Bolsheviks and you pride yourself in being conservative. How readily you are fooled by their lies and propaganda. Should I say something nice about you when you are living a lie and lying for a lifetime? I suppose I could pretend to accede to your lies, pat you on the head and tell you what an intelligent, honest person you are. But I'm not that stupid nor am I so dishonest that I could withhold the truth. You wish to only hear congratulations but you have not earned them yet. You've taken the easy way out, letting others formulate the great thoughts so you can just hitch a ride through life. Mr. Sheeple: Perhaps you had better email NBC and ABC news and set them straight by lecturing them on your view of the 2000 election and the Joe Wilson lies regarding Niger. Stories tonight supported the stories I had sent and which you denounced as lies just because they do not fit that what you want to believe. Sheeple Analyst: There you go again, rushing up to announce that some really big guys are out there supporting your position. I better run away and hide or they'll beat me up! Truth does not show itself by how many newspapers agree with you or how big they are. Truth IS. NBC and ABC are not the arbiters of my life as WND and Newsmax are in yours. You are comfortable with liars and lies, proud to have such muscle on your side. But we aren't on the playground or sandlot, dickie, and your big bruisers are corporate financers of the fascist corporation that have declared that they intend to eventually take over the world. They are owned and controlled by the dark people you can't imagine really exist. So since you can't put your finger on them or even look under the bed, they don't exist. And THAT'S your unsubstantiated opinion. I denounce lies on the basis of fact, not my unsubstantiated opinion. You didn't even support your flimsy opinion with the opinions of NBC and ABC. Looks like you skim for perceived chinks in my armor instead of reading what I actually have to say. Fortunately for me I don't expect that you will actually learn anything or do any real research and what I take the time to write you goes onto the Internet so the people can see a record of the flimsy, fact-free, unprincipled, irrational, illogical, emotionally based thinking of a sheeple of the right. You never respond to my reasons, principles and facts, only to my assertions that spring from the reasons, principles and facts. You NEVER come to grips with the fundamentals that undergird my statements. You only respond with the conclusions. Then thinking we are on a level playing field you trade opinion for opinion as though your unsubstantiated opinions have any ground. Mr. Sheeple: Good question. Now, explain your (and that of your anti-Bush alternative sources') contention that "Bush Lied" when the U.S. intelligence, and that of other countries, believed that Saddam had the weapons and refused to account for their disposal as per the U.N. resolution? Was Bush to wait until the weapons were developed and used on the U.S. as the hated "Infidels", and then you would wail about Bush failing to protect the nation? Oh, I see! Any website information contrary to what you want to believe is all lies, but your alternative sources condeming Bush are acceptable. You are yourself a "sheeple"!
Sheeple Analyst: No you see absolutely nothing. Your organic computer has been programmed to see what you choose to see to support your ideology. Your ideology requires loyalty and fealty to authorities who feed your fears and promise a strong arm to protect you. When you insist on going to the same liars and fear mongers you will run about the pasture bleating in confusion and despair. You make the choices, you chose the lie. Townhall would be a real winner in the propaganda Olympics. Hans Blix tried to tell Bush that their rush to war was based on a lie. Chirac and Schroeder tried to dissuade the chickenhawks. Putin did not agree with the lies. El Baradei said that the Nigerian papers were forgeries. Tenet told Bush not to include the Africa reference in his Cincinnati speech. The Bureau of Intelligence at the State Department disagreed. Your current bleating arises from a dual whitewash in UK and US Senate. Just read the Senate report more carefully and you will see how they skewed the report to support Bush. Cheney set up the Office of Special Plans in the Pentagon and put Zionist Douglas Feith in charge of having amateurs pick through the raw data to develop reports that could be fed to the Executive Branch. Some of the sorriest "intelligence" came from their insistence on using the Iraqi exiles and traitors of Ahmed Chalabi. Karen Kwiatkowski blew the whistle on their gig, but truth does not fit your program. Instead, without knowing anything about her, you dissed her first hand reports and questioned her expertise. She is now a commentator on The Seventh Fire.
July 10, 2004 You can read what you refused to look at a year ago. Now comes the viewpoint of a Bush-appointee, Dr. Kay:
July 19, 2004
none of this appeared anywhere in the Senate report.
July 18, 2004
Lies and disinformation are harder to sustain even in a mock trial. Still no Kurd mass graves from Anfal. Genocide is harder to prove in a real court than it is to create as propaganda.
July 18, 2004
July 14, 2004
July 11, 2004
July 11, 2004
How is an American voter to "choose the lesser of two evils" when the information on which the choice would be made is withheld? July 11, 20 |
